FRWD 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

FRWD

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$29.73

-0.42 ▼ -1.40%

🌙 7월 28일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:10)

$29.71

+0.00 +0.00%

FRWD ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.65%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$260M

약 3557억원

Holdings

27 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Factor & Thematic	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	27	Perf Week ⓘ	-5.91%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$260M	Perf Month ⓘ	-7.28%
Expense ⓘ	0.65%	NAV ⓘ	$30.18	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-14.45%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	5.69%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	37.84%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	16.88%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	1.76%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	694.3%	Return% SI ⓘ	42.97%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	2.14% 2.38%	Perf YTD ⓘ	18.82%
SMA20 ⓘ	-5.56%	SMA50 ⓘ	-6.76%	SMA200 ⓘ	6.91%	RSI (14) ⓘ	39.61	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/1/13	Prev Close ⓘ	$30.15	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.12M	Price ⓘ	$29.73

📊 Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF (FRWD) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF · US Equities - Factor & Thematic

액티브 운용 — 펀드매니저가 종목을 선별해 초과수익 추구

Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF는 장기적인 시대적 변화와 파괴적 혁신의 최전선에 있는 글로벌 기술 기업들에 투자하여 자본 성장을 목표로 하는 액티브 운용 펀드입니다. 바텀업(Bottom-up) 방식의 종목 선정을 통해 진입 장벽이 높고 전체 경제 대비 빠른 이익 성장이 기대되는 모든 규모의 기업들을 발굴하여 투자합니다.

📘 FRWD ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitytechnologygrowth

규모: $260M 약 3557억원
운용사: Nomura
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.65% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the US Equities - Factor & Thematic median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.65%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$650K

Pay $250K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$400K

Based on expense ratio of 0.40%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$11.6M

12.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

VOTE

TCW Transform 500 ETF

0.05%

-0.60%p annually

USCA

Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF

0.07%

-0.58%p annually

LRGF

iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

0.08%

-0.57%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

하위 25%

±2.38%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-18.5%

Drawdown duration: 2 months

2026-01-28 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 16 days

2026-01-13 Worst -13% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

1.04

Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

낮음

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

낮음

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who believe in active strategies

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.65% annually
⚠️Volatility is above average

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

25개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

25개

상위 10개 비중

58.1%

최대 단일 종목

8.75%

집중도(HHI)

487

낮음 (분산)

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

59.6%

Communication Services

16.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%

Financial

0.4%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 58.1% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 NVDA NVIDIA Corp.

8.75%

#2 STX Seagate Technology Holdings plc

7.22%

#3 AMD Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

6.49%

#4 TSM Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. Ltd.

6.05%

#5 LRCX Lam Research Corp.

5.21%

#6 META Meta Platforms, Inc.

5.10%

#7 MU Micron Technology, Inc.

5.00%

#8 AVGO Broadcom, Inc.

4.89%

#9 ASML ASML Holding NV

4.68%

#10 NFLX Netflix, Inc.

4.67%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Factor & Thematic

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Factor & Thematic

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 FRWD보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 FRWD보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
FRWD	Nomura Transformational Technologies ETF	0.65%	$260M	27	-	+18.82%	-
DYNF	iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF	0.26% ▲	$38.2B ▲	229	0.81%	-	+19.23%
THRO	iShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF	0.57% ▲	$6.4B ▲	245	0.26%	-	+15.50%
ARKK	ARK Innovation ETF	0.75% ▼	$5.8B ▲	48	-	-	-5.71%
JMEE	JPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF	0.24% ▲	$2.9B ▲	658	0.94%	-	+25.48%
DFSU	Dimensional US Sustainability Core 1 ETF	0.15% ▲	$2.3B ▲	1940	0.83%	-	+16.53%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ FRWD보다 유리 · ▼ FRWD보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as FRWD using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of FRWD, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with FRWD, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)