FAAA 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

FAAA

Fidelity AAA CLO ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$50.35

+0.00 +0.00%

🌙 7월 28일 7:34 PM ET (한국 7/29 08:34)

$50.35

+0.00 +0.00%

FAAA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$74M

약 1015억원

Holdings

180 items

Dividend Yield

1.67%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities	Asset Type ⓘ	Bonds	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	180	Perf Week ⓘ	-
ETF Type ⓘ	US Bonds	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$74M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.01%
Expense ⓘ	-	NAV ⓘ	$50.25	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.29%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	0.26%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.84 (1.67%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	1.36%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	31.06%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	266.09%	Return% SI ⓘ	5%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.13% 0.1%	Perf YTD ⓘ	0.53%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.16%	SMA50 ⓘ	0.2%	SMA200 ⓘ	0.4%	RSI (14) ⓘ	65.59	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/2/12	Prev Close ⓘ	$50.35	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.04M	Price ⓘ	$50.35

📊 Fidelity AAA CLO ETF (FAAA) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Fidelity AAA CLO ETF · Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities

채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)

Fidelity AAA CLO ETF는 수익 창출을 목표로 하는 액티브 운용 펀드로, 일반적으로 자산의 최소 80%를 AAA 등급(또는 그에 상응하는 등급)의 대출채권담보부증권(CLO)에 투자합니다. 현금 흐름에 대한 우선권을 가진 최선순위 트랜치에 집중 투자하며, 액티브 매니지먼트를 통해 신용 품질과 구조적 보호 장치를 관리하는 동시에 낮은 이자율 민감도를 유지하고자 합니다.

U.S.debtdebt-securitiesCLO

규모: $74M 약 1015억원
운용사: Fidelity
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0% annually

Limited category sample — assessed against all ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

Category Median Annual Cost

No category distribution data available

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

0.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF

0.19%

--0.19%p annually

JAAA

Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF

0.20%

--0.20%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Bond Benchmark

Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.

🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm

Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.10%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-0.6%

Drawdown duration: 0 months

2026-02-26 → 2026-03-05

Recovered in about 26 days

2026-02-12 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.35

Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Bond distribution — 1.67% annually

Coupon interest is the primary source.

ℹ️ Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.

배당수익률

1.67%

주당 배당

$0.84

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

반기배당

2월 · 3월

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $1K

5년 누적 (세후) $7K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 적합

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors seeking portfolio stability

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

채권 포트폴리오

주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

194개

상위 10개 비중

39.1%

최대 단일 종목

13.00%

집중도(HHI)

419

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Financial

5.1%

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 39.1% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - Fidelity Revere Street Trust

13.00%

#2 - Fidelity Revere Street Trust

4.57%

#3 - ARES LOAN FUNDING VIII LTD

3.76%

#4 - AIMCO CLO 23 LTD

2.71%

#5 - OAK HILL CREDIT PARTNERS LTD

2.51%

#6 - RR 36 LTD / RR 36 LLC

2.51%

#7 - INVESCO US CLO 2024-3 LTD

2.51%

#8 - OAKTREE CLO LTD

2.51%

#9 - OAKTREE CLO 2020-1 LTD

2.50%

#10 - MAGNETITE XXVI LTD / MAGNETITE XXVI LLC

2.50%

Category Peers

Category: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 1/6위

카테고리: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 FAAA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 FAAA보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
FAAA	Fidelity AAA CLO ETF	0%	$74M	180	1.67%	+0.53%	-
JAAA	Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	0.2% ▼	$29.2B ▲	596	4.94% ▲	-	-0.20%
PAAA	PGIM AAA CLO ETF	0.19% ▼	$11.2B ▲	318	4.83% ▲	-	-0.02%
FSEC	Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF	0.36% ▼	$4.6B ▲	1151	4.45% ▲	-	+0.74%
CLOA	iShares AAA CLO Active ETF	0.2% ▼	$2.2B ▲	411	4.89% ▲	-	+0.11%
CLOI	VanEck CLO ETF	0.36% ▼	$1.5B ▲	183	5.26% ▲	-	-0.08%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ FAAA보다 유리 · ▼ FAAA보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

1 ETFs tracking the same theme as FAAA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1)

Not direct derivatives of FAAA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with FAAA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)