Direxion Daily Regional Banks Bull 3X Shares는 수수료 차감 전 기준으로 S&P Regional Banks Select Industry Index 일일 성과의 300%에 해당하는 일일 투자 성과를 목표로 합니다. 순자산의 80% 이상을 스왑 계약, 지수 구성 증권, 지수 추종 ETF, 지수에 대해 일일 레버리지 익스포저를 제공하는 금융 상품에 투자합니다. 지수는 S&P Total Market Index 구성 종목 중 GICS 지역은행 서브업종으로 분류된 종목의 성과를 측정하도록 설계된 수정 동일 가중 지수입니다. 비분산형 ETF입니다.
16.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
💡Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Near the Equity - Leveraged / Inverse median.+24.6%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
⚡ Leveraged ETF — beware of compounding decay over long holding periods
These ETFs aim to deliver 2–3× the daily return of the underlying index, but during sideways or volatile markets, compounding effects can cause long-term cumulative returns to diverge significantly from 2–3× the index. They are suited for short-term trading and are not appropriate as core holdings for long-term portfolios.
If you had invested 10 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$28.2M
→
Total loss
$-71,767,789
Annualized -11.9%
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +42.44%
상위 25%
Outperformed the benchmark by 24.6%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +23.69%Cumulative +89.2%
상위 25%
Outperformed the benchmark by 4.7%p annually
My positionTop 25%
Low rangeAverageHigh range
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -14.98%Cumulative -55.6%
평균권
Trailed the benchmark by 27.9%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized -11.88%Cumulative -71.8%
평균권
Trailed the benchmark by 26.8%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
10Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2016-07-28 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
ℹ️Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
DPSTS&P 500 (SPY)
+120%
0%
−120%
+7%
2017
-57%
2018
+60%
2019
-77%
2020
+112%
2021
-56%
2022
-55%
2023
+14%
2024
-3%
2025
+40%
2026 YTD
💡 Leveraged ETFs have an asymmetric structure: big wins in up markets, big losses in down markets.
ℹ️Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
2/9Y
Lags behind benchmark (22%)
+ 2026 YTD: Ahead (39.8% vs 8.5%)
2017✗
2018✗
2019✓
2020✗
2021✓
2022✗
2023✗
2024✗
2025✗
2026✓YTD
💡 Leveraged wins in up markets, loses big in down markets — annual return dispersion matters more than win rate.
ℹ️Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
⚠️312%
Falls more than the benchmark — vulnerable in drawdowns
<85% (Defend)85~110% (Track)>110% (Lag)
💡 Leveraged ETFs are designed to fall 2–3x the benchmark — values above 200% are normal. Short-term risk must be considered.
ℹ️Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
⚖️
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
High Risk
These 2-3x leveraged products are structurally very volatile. Holding them long-term can erode your principal in ways that don't match expectations, so they're better suited for short-term trading.
⚡ Leveraged ETF — High Beta & Volatility Are by Design
A Beta of 2 or higher and volatility 2–3× the underlying index is by design. The "high volatility" reading below is a feature of the product, not a problem. However, long-term holding can lead to compounding decay and results that differ from expectations.
Beta (market sensitivity)
평균권
2.54
If the market rises +10%+25.4%
If the market falls -10%-25.4%
My positionMid-range
Low rangeAverageHigh range
ℹ️A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권
±4.81%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-97.7%
Drawdown duration: 63 months
2018-03-09 → 2023-05-11
Still recovering
2015-08-20Worst -97%2026-07-01
ℹ️Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.17
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-28.2%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
💵
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
💵
Leveraged ETF distribution — 1.52% annually
Its leveraged structure makes it unsuitable for long-term dividend investing.5-year dividend growth rate: +0.5%.
ℹ️Leveraged ETFs are not designed for dividend income. Even if they temporarily show a high yield, their structure makes them unsuitable for long-term dividend investing.
배당수익률
1.52%
주당 배당
$2.18
연간 기준
5년 성장률
0.5%
지급 주기
분기배당
3월 · 9월 · 12월
📊 총 이력 2017~2026 (35건)
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
$4.42
2017
$13.52+205.9%
2018
$13.46-0.4%
2019
$2.16-83.9%
2020
$2.91+34.7%
2021
$3.41+17.1%
2022
$1.73-49.4%
2023
$1.70-1.3%
2024
$2.20+29.4%
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금+X% 전년 대비 증가-X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 35건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-03-24
$0.395
—
2.78%
2025-12-23
$0.626
—
2.20%
2025-09-23
$0.490
—
2.19%
2025-06-24
$0.608
—
2.70%
2025-03-25
$0.480
—
1.73%
2024-12-23
$0.213
—
1.53%
2024-09-24
$0.493
—
1.99%
2024-06-25
$0.441
—
3.09%
2024-03-19
$0.556
—
3.39%
2023-12-21
$0.444
—
1.80%
2023-09-19
$0.462
—
5.13%
2023-06-21
$0.460
—
5.83%
2023-03-21
$0.360
—
4.13%
2022-12-20
$0.470
—
1.96%
2022-09-20
$1.19
—
1.41%
2022-06-22
$0.860
—
1.55%
2022-03-22
$0.890
—
0.77%
2021-12-21
$0.670
—
0.76%
2021-09-21
$0.678
—
0.94%
2021-06-22
$0.712
—
0.67%
2021-03-23
$0.852
—
0.69%
2020-12-22
$0.560
—
2.36%
2020-09-22
$0.440
—
9.81%
2020-06-23
$0.342
—
8.80%
2020-03-24
$0.820
—
11.41%
2019-12-23
$2.94
—
1.63%
2019-09-24
$3.50
—
2.37%
2019-06-25
$4.04
—
1.93%
2019-03-19
$2.98
—
1.73%
2018-12-27
$3.64
—
2.25%
2018-09-25
$4.46
—
0.82%
2018-06-19
$3.36
—
0.44%
2018-03-20
$2.06
—
0.37%
2017-12-19
$2.36
—
0.29%
2017-03-21
$2.06
—
0.18%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후)$1K
5년 누적 (세후)$7K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0.45% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
🎯
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
⚠️
Designed for short-term tradingNot recommended for long-term investing, but suitable for short-term trading and hedging.
⚠️ 2–3x leveraged product; not suitable for long-term holding. Use as a short-term trading tool only.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
🌳
장기 보유
수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때
부적합
💵
배당 인컴
매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때
부적합
⚡
단기 트레이딩
며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매
매우 적합
🧩
포트폴리오 보조
자산 배분·헤지 용도
매우 낮음
👤
이런 분에게 어울려요
Short-term traders only
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
🎯Trails benchmark by -27.9%p annually
🎢Leveraged — compounding decay can produce results that differ from expectations over long holds
🧺
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
파생상품 기반 ETF
실제 보유 종목이 일반 ETF와 다르게 스왑·선물 중심이에요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
1 ETFs tracking the same theme as DPST using leveraged or covered call strategies (Inverse 1)
Not direct derivatives of DPST, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with DPST, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
📉Inverse1ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme