DFAL 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

DFAL

Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF

7월 28일 2:54 PM ET (한국 7/29 03:54)

$50.04

+0.19 ▲ +0.38%

🌙 7월 28일 4:04 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:04)

$50.04

+0.00 +0.00%

DFAL ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.12%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$1.5B

약 2조원

Holdings

695 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Broad Market & Size	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	695	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.54%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$1.5B	Perf Month ⓘ	0.98%
Expense ⓘ	0.12%	NAV ⓘ	$49.86	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-1.57%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	2.91%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	44.65%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	44.65%	Return% SI ⓘ	9.42%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.91% 0.65%	Perf YTD ⓘ	0.91%
SMA20 ⓘ	-0.39%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.12%	SMA200 ⓘ	-0.12%	RSI (14) ⓘ	53.95	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/6/23	Prev Close ⓘ	$49.85	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.41M	Price ⓘ	$50.04

📊 Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF (DFAL) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF · US Equities - Broad Market & Size

광범위 지수형 — 시총 버킷 미상의 광범위 지수 추종

📘 DFAL ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitymomentumvalue

규모: $1.5B 약 2조원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.12% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - Broad Market & Size category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.12%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$120K

Save $110K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$230K

Based on expense ratio of 0.23%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$2.2M

2.3% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

SPYM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

0.02%

-0.10%p annually

BBUS

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.65%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

매우 적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term DCA and diversified investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Broad Market & Size

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 5/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Broad Market & Size

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 DFAL보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 DFAL보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
DFAL	Dimensional US Large Cap Core Equity Market ETF	0.12%	$1.5B	695	-	+0.91%	-
VOO	Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	0.03% ▲	$982.4B ▲	519	1.08%	-	+16.32%
IVV	iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	0.03% ▲	$866.0B ▲	509	1.10%	-	+16.30%
SPY	SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust	0.09% ▲	$785.2B ▲	505	1.02%	-	+16.32%
VTI	Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	0.03% ▲	$658.5B ▲	3544	1.07%	-	+16.71%
QQQ	Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1	0.18% ▼	$452.0B ▲	105	0.45%	-	+18.89%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ DFAL보다 유리 · ▼ DFAL보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

1 ETFs tracking the same theme as DFAL using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 1)

Not direct derivatives of DFAL, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with DFAL, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 1 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)