CAM
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF
7월 28일 12:49 PM ET (한국 7/29 01:49)
$24.86
+0.05 ▲ +0.20%
CAM ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.27%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$1.2B
약 2조원
Holdings
447 items
Dividend Yield
2.51%
Management Style
Active
| Category | Bonds - Municipal | Asset Type | Bonds | Return% 1Y | - | Total Holdings | 447 | Perf Week | -0.44% |
| ETF Type | US Bonds | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $1.2B | Perf Month | -1.11% |
| Expense | 0.27% | NAV | $24.81 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | -2.93% | Perf Quarter | -1% |
| Dividend TTM | $0.62 (2.51%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 0.53% | Perf Half Y | -1.43% |
| Flows% 1M | 1.06% | Flows% YTD | 9.08% | Return% SI | 2.07% | Volatility(W/M) | 0.25% 0.37% | Perf YTD | -0.94% |
| SMA20 | -0.55% | SMA50 | -0.65% | SMA200 | -1.02% | RSI (14) | 37.79 | Beta | - |
| IPO | 2025/10/6 | Prev Close | $24.81 | Perf Year | - | Avg Volume | 0.12M | Price | $24.86 |
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF · Bonds - Municipal
채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)
2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.
AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF는 원금 안전성과, 캘리포니아 거주자의 연방·주 세금을 고려한 총수익 극대화를 목표로 합니다. 순자산의 80% 이상을 캘리포니아주 또는 그 지방자치단체가 발행했거나 캘리포니아 주세가 면제되는 지방채 포트폴리오에 투자합니다. 실효 듀레이션 3.5~7년을 유지합니다. 비분산 투자 펀드입니다.
📘 CAM ETF 자세히 알아보기 →U.S.fixed-incomebondsmunicipal-bonds
- 규모
- $1.2B 약 2조원
- 운용사
- AllianceBernstein
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2025년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.27% annually
Mid-range within the Bonds - Municipal category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.27%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$270K
Same as category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$270K
Based on expense ratio of 0.27%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$4.9M
5.1% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
VTEB
Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
0.03%
-0.24%p annually
SCMB
Schwab Municipal Bond ETF
0.03%
-0.24%p annually
MUB
iShares National Muni Bond ETF
0.05%
-0.22%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
Insufficient return data
This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Bond Benchmark
Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.
🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm
Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).
Average daily range (last 1 month)
하위 25%±0.37%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-2.2%
2025-10-06 Worst -5% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
-0.58
Poor — Underperforms the risk-free rate
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Bond distribution — 2.51% annually
Coupon interest is the primary source.
Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.
배당수익률
2.51%
주당 배당
$0.62
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
분기배당
2월 · 3월 · 4월 · 11월 · 12월
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
—
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
$0.22
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 6건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-04-01
$0.072
—
1.76%
2026-03-02
$0.074
—
1.45%
2026-02-02
$0.076
—
1.16%
2025-12-31
$0.078
—
0.86%
2025-12-01
$0.073
—
0.55%
2025-11-03
$0.066
—
0.26%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $2K
5년 누적 (세후) $11K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
낮음
적합
매우 낮음
매우 적합
이런 분에게 어울려요
Investors seeking portfolio stability
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
- ⚠️Volatility is above average
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
채권 포트폴리오
주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
843개
상위 10개 비중
20.7%
최대 단일 종목
4.44%
집중도(HHI)
134
낮음 (분산)
🥧 섹터 비중
Financial -0.1%
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 20.7% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
#1 - City of Los Angeles CA 4.44%
#2 - City of Los Angeles CA 4.30%
#3 - University of California 1.77%
#4 - California Community Choice Financing Authority 1.60%
#5 - California Community Choice Financing Authority 1.52%
#6 - California Community Choice Financing Authority 1.50%
#7 - California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank 1.43%
#8 - California Community Choice Financing Authority 1.40%
#9 - California Infrastructure & Economic Development Bank 1.39%
#10 - San Francisco City & County Airport Comm-San Francisco International Airport 1.33%
Category Peers
Category: Bonds - Municipal
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 3/6위
카테고리: Bonds - Municipal
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 CAM보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 CAM보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAM | AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 0.27% | $1.2B | 447 | 2.51% | -0.94% | - |
| PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 0.35% ▼ | $3.1B ▲ | 656 | 3.34% ▲ | - | +1.47% | |
| VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF | 0.18% ▲ | $2.1B ▲ | 1377 | 3.02% ▲ | - | +1.49% | |
| BNY Mellon Municipal Intermediate ETF | 0.35% ▼ | $1.7B ▲ | 537 | 1.29% ▼ | - | - | |
| Vanguard Intermediate-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.08% ▲ | $1.5B ▲ | 5994 | 3.09% ▲ | - | +1.33% | |
| NYLI MacKay Muni Intermediate ETF | 0.3% ▼ | $1.5B ▲ | 856 | 3.65% ▲ | - | +1.31% |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ CAM보다 유리 · ▼ CAM보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
9 ETFs tracking the same theme as CAM using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)
Not direct derivatives of CAM, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with CAM, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
Inverse 3 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 4 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is CAM?
CAM is an ETF in the Bonds - Municipal category, managed by AllianceBernstein.
How many holdings does CAM have?
CAM holds a total of 447 securities, with an AUM of approximately $1.2B.
Does CAM pay dividends (distributions)?
CAM's distribution yield is approximately 2.51%.
What is the 52-week high and low for CAM?
CAM has recorded a 52-week high of $25.61 and a low of $24.73.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.