BUSA
Brandes U.S. Value ETF
7월 28일 11:24 AM ET (한국 7/29 24:24)
$40.94
+0.30 ▲ +0.75%
BUSA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.
Total Expense Ratio
0.6%
Annual operating cost
Net Assets (AUM)
$309M
약 4231억원
Holdings
64 items
Dividend Yield
1.41%
Management Style
Active
| Category | US Equities - US Style | Asset Type | Equities (Stocks) | Return% 1Y | 20.69% | Total Holdings | 64 | Perf Week | 1.84% |
| ETF Type | US Equities | Active/Passive | Active | Return% 3Y | - | AUM | $309M | Perf Month | 3.54% |
| Expense | 0.6% | NAV | $40.63 | Return% 5Y | - | 52W High | 0.42% | Perf Quarter | 6.47% |
| Dividend TTM | $0.58 (1.41%) | Div Gr. 3/5Y | - | Return% 10Y | - | 52W Low | 25.83% | Perf Half Y | 7.43% |
| Flows% 1M | -0.24% | Flows% YTD | -1.19% | Return% SI | 20.52% | Volatility(W/M) | 0.63% 0.75% | Perf YTD | 12.01% |
| SMA20 | 1.96% | SMA50 | 3.5% | SMA200 | 8.6% | RSI (14) | 65.15 | Beta | 0.64 |
| IPO | 2023/10/5 | Prev Close | $40.64 | Perf Year | 20.17% | Avg Volume | 0.02M | Price | $40.94 |
Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) Investment Analysis
ETF Overview
Brandes U.S. Value ETF · US Equities - US Style
가치주형 — 저평가된 가치주 중심 포트폴리오
2023년 상장, 3년 운영 중.
Brandes U.S. Value ETF is an actively managed ETF that seeks long-term capital appreciation. It primarily invests in stocks of U.S. companies to achieve its investment objective and, under normal market conditions, invests at least 80% of its net assets (including borrowings for investment purposes) at the time of purchase in securities of U.S. companies.
📘 BUSA ETF 자세히 알아보기 →U.S.equitylarge-capvalue
- 규모
- $309M 약 4231억원
- 운용사
- Brandes
- 운용 방식
- 액티브 (운용사 재량)
- 상장일
- 2023년
Cost Efficiency
Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact
Average expense ratio — 0.6% annually
Mid-range within the US Equities - US Style category.
Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)
평균권0.6%
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount
$100.0M
Annual Expense Ratio
$600K
Pay $180K more per year vs. category average
Category Median Annual Cost
$420K
Based on expense ratio of 0.42%
10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)
$10.8M
11.1% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees
Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.
Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.
Cheaper alternatives in the same category
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.03%
-0.57%p annually
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
0.03%
-0.57%p annually
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.04%
-0.56%p annually
* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.
Long-Term Performance
1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense
Insufficient return data
+2.9%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.
ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.
If you had invested 1 year(s) ago
$100.0M
Today's value
$120.7M
→
Total gain
+$20.7M
Annualized +20.7%
1 Year
2025.07 ~ 2026.07
Annualized +20.69%
평균권Outperformed the benchmark by 2.9%p annually
My positionMid-range
Low range Average High range
3 Years
2023.07 ~ 2026.07
Insufficient data
5 Years
2021.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2023/10 — under 5 years
10Y
2016.07 ~ 2026.07
Listed 2023/10 — under 10 years
3Y Cumulative Total Return Curve
2023-10-05 start, based on a 100M KRW base — read the curve values directly as units of 100M KRW (e.g., 308 → 3.08억 / 308M KRW). Both this ETF and the benchmark are rebased to 100 on the same start date for comparison.
BUSA · Price Only BUSA · Price + Cumulative Dividends BUSA · Dividend Reinvested S&P 500 (SPY)
50
100
150
200
ℹ️ Price Only: Excludes dividends and tracks pure stock price only. Covered-call and high-dividend ETFs often show a flat or declining line on this view, which is meaningful from a "principal preservation" standpoint. Price + Cumulative Dividend: Share count stays the same and received dividends are accumulated as cash. Closely matches your actual account total assets. Reinvested: Dividends are immediately used to buy additional shares (adjClose-based, the industry standard for total return). The wider the gap between the three lines, the easier it is to gauge the effectiveness of the dividend strategy.
Annual Return Comparison
ETF returns vs S&P 500 (SPY) by calendar year
BUSA S&P 500 (SPY)
+40%
0%
−40%
2023
2024
2025
2026 YTD
ℹ️ Returns from January 1 to December 31 of each year. The current year (2026) column is dimmed to indicate YTD (incomplete). If blue is higher than gray, the ETF outperformed the benchmark in that year.
Win rate vs S&P 500 (SPY)
0 / 3Y
Lags behind benchmark (0%)
+ 2026 YTD: Ahead (11.4% vs 8.5%)
2023 ✗
2024 ✗
2025 ✗
2026 ✓ YTD
ℹ️ Number of winning years versus S&P 500 (SPY) within a completed calendar year (1/1–12/31). The current year (YTD) is reported separately.
Downside Capture
58%
Falls less than the benchmark in drawdowns — strong downside protection
<85% (Defend) 85~110% (Track) >110% (Lag)
ℹ️ Average % drop of this ETF when S&P 500 (SPY) is −1%. Based on daily returns over the past 3 years (only days where the benchmark is negative).
Risk Profile
Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History
Overall Risk Grade
Low Risk
Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.
Beta (market sensitivity)
상위 25%0.64
If the market rises +10% +6.4%
If the market falls -10% -6.4%
My positionTop 25%
Low range Average High range
ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.
Average daily range (last 1 month)
평균권±0.75%
S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more
Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)
ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.
Max Drawdown · Past 10 years
-14.2%
2023-10-05 Worst -8% 2026-07-01
ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.
Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)
1.30
Good — Solid risk-adjusted returns
ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.
Estimated Monthly Maximum Loss (VaR 95%)
-4.9%
Historically, monthly losses exceeding this figure occurred only5%of the time.
ℹ️ A statistical estimate meaning "with 95% probability, monthly losses will not exceed this amount." The remaining 5% corresponds to crisis-level events such as financial crises or pandemics.
Dividend Analysis
Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator
Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 1.41% annually
Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.
Dividends are a secondary source of performance; the main expected return comes from share-price appreciation.
배당수익률
1.41%
주당 배당
$0.58
연간 기준
5년 성장률
-
지급 주기
분기배당
3월 · 9월 · 12월
연도별 배당 총액 추이
주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.
—
2021
—
2022
$0.06
2023
$0.43 +608.2%
2024
$0.56 +29.9%
2025
$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소
최근 배당 이력 총 10건
아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.
배당락일
주당 금액
지급일
당시 수익률
2026-03-30
$0.131
—
1.59%
2025-12-30
$0.171
—
1.92%
2025-09-29
$0.115
—
1.55%
2025-06-27
$0.159
—
1.91%
2025-03-28
$0.116
—
1.47%
2024-12-30
$0.147
—
1.37%
2024-09-27
$0.104
—
1.09%
2024-06-27
$0.111
—
0.81%
2024-03-26
$0.070
—
0.43%
2023-12-27
$0.061
—
0.22%
* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.
💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면
연간 배당금 (세후) $1K
5년 누적 (세후) $6K
* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.
* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.
Overall investment appeal
What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile
An average ETF No standout strengths or weaknesses — pretty run-of-the-mill.
🎯 목적별 적합도
내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.
적합
보통
매우 낮음
보통
이런 분에게 어울려요
Value investors
✅ 강점
뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.
⚠️ 약점·주의사항
특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.
Portfolio Composition
What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings
65개 종목에 넓게 분산
개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.
ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?
ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.
🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기
총 보유종목
65개
상위 10개 비중
24.4%
최대 단일 종목
2.86%
집중도(HHI)
172
낮음 (분산)
🥧 섹터 비중
Healthcare 19.8% +9%p
Financial 16.5% +4%p
Technology 12.3% -18%p
Industrials 10.0%
Energy 7.5% +3%p
Communication Services 5.4% -4%p
Basic Materials 4.7%
Consumer Defensive 4.6%
Consumer Cyclical 4.5% -5%p
Utilities 2.4%
S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)
📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 24.4% 차지
티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)
Category Peers
Category: US Equities - US Style
같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위
카테고리: US Equities - US Style
ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?
같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 BUSA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 BUSA보다 불리를 뜻해요.
| 티커 | ETF명 | 보수율 | AUM | 보유종목 | 배당률 | YTD | 1년 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUSA | Brandes U.S. Value ETF | 0.6% | $309M | 64 | 1.41% | +12.01% | +20.17% |
| Vanguard Value ETF | 0.03% ▲ | $188.3B ▲ | 325 | 1.84% ▲ | - | +22.73% ▲ | |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | 0.18% ▲ | $80.9B ▲ | 875 | 1.40% ▼ | - | +25.45% ▲ | |
| iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | 0.18% ▲ | $48.9B ▲ | 444 | 1.52% ▲ | - | +15.86% ▼ | |
| Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF | 0.05% ▲ | $37.2B ▲ | 844 | 1.76% ▲ | - | +20.77% ▲ | |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | 0.04% ▲ | $36.1B ▲ | 440 | 1.68% ▲ | - | +15.77% ▼ |
AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ BUSA보다 유리 · ▼ BUSA보다 불리
Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme
ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy
16 ETFs tracking the same theme as BUSA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 5)
Not direct derivatives of BUSA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.
ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?
Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with BUSA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.
⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding
Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.
Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)
BULZ
MicroSectorsTM Solactive FANG Innovation 3X Leveraged ETNs
-2.26%
$2.5B
FDRX
Founder-Led 2X Daily ETF
+2.99%
$11M
MTUL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Momentum Factor TR ETN
-3.17%
$8M
QULL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Quality Factor TR ETN
+0.55%
$7M
IWDL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Value Factor TR ETN
+1.02%
$7M
IWFL
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Growth Factor TR ETN
-1.00%
$5M
USML
ETRACS 2x Leveraged MSCI US Minimum Volatility Factor TR ETN
+1.20%
$4M
ISSB
IncomeSTKd 1x US Stocks & 1x Bitcoin Premium ETF
+1.65%
$2M
Inverse 3 ETFs that bet on declines in the same theme
Covered Call & Options 5 ETFs that add a monthly dividend via covered calls on the same theme
FAQ
What kind of ETF is BUSA?
BUSA is an ETF in the US Equities - US Style category, managed by Brandes.
How many holdings does BUSA have?
BUSA holds a total of 64 securities, with an AUM of approximately $309M.
Does BUSA pay dividends (distributions)?
BUSA's distribution yield is approximately 1.41%.
What is the 52-week high and low for BUSA?
BUSA has recorded a 52-week high of $40.77 and a low of $32.54.
면책조항: 본 콘텐츠는 참고 자료이며 투자 권유가 아닙니다. 모든 투자의 책임은 투자자 본인에게 있습니다.