ANV 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

ANV

GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF

7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$25.00

+0.03 ▲ +0.12%

🌙 7월 28일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:10)

$24.99

+0.00 +0.00%

ANV ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

1.07%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$3M

약 44억원

Holdings

12 items

Dividend Yield

6.96%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Industry Sector	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	12	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.32%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equity Income	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$3M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.22%
Expense ⓘ	1.07%	NAV ⓘ	$24.88	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-3.44%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	-1.24%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$1.74 (6.96%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	3.02%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	30.06%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	340.22%	Return% SI ⓘ	17.21%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.61% 0.61%	Perf YTD ⓘ	0.28%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.03%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.32%	SMA200 ⓘ	0%	RSI (14) ⓘ	48.8	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/2/3	Prev Close ⓘ	$24.97	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$25

📊 GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF (ANV) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF · US Equities - Industry Sector

배당 인컴형 — 꾸준한 배당 수익 목적의 배당주 바구니

The GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF is an actively managed, non-diversified fund that seeks to generate returns and provide limited downside protection through a synthetic strategy based on the common stock of NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). It uses a laddered (staggered maturity) portfolio of autocallable over-the-counter option contracts that are automatically called (redeemed) and pay a conditional coupon if the underlying asset reaches a specified price barrier.

U.S.single-assetNVDAautocallable

규모: $3M 약 44억원
운용사: GraniteShares
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 1.07% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the US Equities - Industry Sector median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

1.07%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$1.1M

Pay $570K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$500K

Based on expense ratio of 0.50%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$18.8M

19.4% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF

0.08%

-0.99%p annually

XLF

State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF

0.08%

-0.99%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.61%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-3.2%

Drawdown duration: 0 months

2026-06-01 → 2026-06-11

Still recovering

2026-02-04 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.95

Average — Moderate risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Dividend-paying ETF — 6.96% annually

An ETF that provides consistent dividend income.

ℹ️ This ETF is designed for dividend income. Distributions mainly come from dividends paid by its holdings, plus a small amount of interest, making them relatively stable.

배당수익률

6.96%

주당 배당

$1.74

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

반기배당

3월 · 4월

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $6K

5년 누적 (세후) $30K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who want consistent dividend income

✅ 강점

🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 1.07% annually

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

배당주 중심 포트폴리오

주로 배당을 꾸준히 지급하는 기업들로 구성되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

19개

상위 10개 비중

77.8%

최대 단일 종목

16.22%

집중도(HHI)

878

보통

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 77.8% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - PIMCO FUNDS

16.22%

#2 - PIMCO FUNDS

15.87%

#3 - PIMCO FUNDS

9.60%

#4 - PIMCO FUNDS

5.31%

#5 - PIMCO FUNDS

5.28%

#6 - PIMCO FUNDS

5.26%

#7 - PIMCO FUNDS

5.22%

#8 - PIMCO FUNDS

5.09%

#9 - PIMCO FUNDS

5.05%

#10 - PIMCO FUNDS

4.92%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Industry Sector

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Industry Sector

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 ANV보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 ANV보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
ANV	GraniteShares Autocallable NVDA ETF	1.07%	$3M	12	6.96%	+0.28%	-
GRNY	Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF	0.75% ▲	$4.3B ▲	44	0.07% ▼	-	+13.77%
MAGS	Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	0.3% ▲	$3.7B ▲	24	1.54% ▼	-	+9.00%
ARKG	ARK Genomic Revolution ETF	0.75% ▲	$1.6B ▲	33	-	-	+47.27%
XLSR	State Street US Sector Rotation ETF	0.7% ▲	$999M ▲	26	0.47% ▼	-	+13.61%
SSUS	Day Hagan Smart Sector ETF	0.77% ▲	$561M ▲	17	0.46% ▼	-	+17.45%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ ANV보다 유리 · ▼ ANV보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

24 ETFs tracking the same theme as ANV using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 8 · Inverse 8 · Covered Call 8)

Not direct derivatives of ANV, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with ANV, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 8 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)