AFGR 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

AFGR

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF

7월 28일 1:38 PM ET (한국 7/29 02:38)

$35.64

+0.07 ▲ +0.20%

AFGR ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.65%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$91M

약 1244억원

Holdings

74 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Broad Market & Size	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	3.85%	Total Holdings ⓘ	74	Perf Week ⓘ	-2.17%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	17.19%	AUM ⓘ	$91M	Perf Month ⓘ	1.16%
Expense ⓘ	0.65%	NAV ⓘ	$35.60	Return% 5Y ⓘ	6.27%	52W High ⓘ	-6.26%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	0.22%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	18.51%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	1.19%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	2.04%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	0.5%	Return% SI ⓘ	10.15%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.39% 0.64%	Perf YTD ⓘ	0.59%
SMA20 ⓘ	-2%	SMA50 ⓘ	-1.89%	SMA200 ⓘ	1.74%	RSI (14) ⓘ	42.37	Beta ⓘ	1.26
IPO ⓘ	2020/7/22	Prev Close ⓘ	$35.57	Perf Year ⓘ	2.95%	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.01M	Price ⓘ	$35.64

📊 First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF (AFGR) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF · US Equities - Broad Market & Size

광범위 지수형 — 시총 버킷 미상의 광범위 지수 추종

2020년 상장, 6년 운영 중.

📘 AFGR ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitygrowthlarge-cap

규모: $91M 약 1244억원
운용사: -
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2020년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Above-average cost — 0.65% annually

Expense ratio is higher than the US Equities - Broad Market & Size median. Compare against similar ETFs.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

하위 25%

0.65%

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$650K

Pay $420K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$230K

Based on expense ratio of 0.23%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$11.6M

12.0% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

SPYM

State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF

0.02%

-0.63%p annually

BBUS

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Returns slightly below average

하위 25% vs. US Equities - Broad Market & Size.-13.9%p vs. benchmark (SPY) over 1Y.

ℹ️ The "1Y·3Y·5Y·10Y" periods below represent annualized returns (CAGR) measured backward from today. Example: "3Y +12%" means the investment grew at a compounded 12% per year over the past three years.

If you had invested 5 year(s) ago

$100.0M

Today's value

$135.5M

→

Total gain

+$35.5M

Annualized +6.3%

1 Year

2025.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +3.85%

하위 5%

Trailed the benchmark by 13.9%p annually

My positionBottom 5%

Low range Average High range

3 Years

2023.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +17.19% Cumulative +60.9%

평균권

Trailed the benchmark by 2.1%p annually

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

5 Years

2021.07 ~ 2026.07

Annualized +6.27% Cumulative +35.5%

하위 25%

Trailed the benchmark by 7.0%p annually

My positionBottom 25%

Low range Average High range

10Y

2016.07 ~ 2026.07

Listed 2020/7 — under 10 years

Calculating benchmark comparison metrics…

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Beta (market sensitivity)

하위 5%

1.26

If the market rises +10% +12.6%

If the market falls -10% -12.6%

My positionBottom 5%

Low range Average High range

ℹ️ A beta of 1.0 moves in line with the market. Above 1 means it moves more than the market; below 1 means less.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

평균권

±0.64%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Warrants a closer look Several metrics show warning signs. Compare it with similar ETFs before deciding.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

매우 적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Long-term DCA and diversified investors

✅ 강점

뚜렷한 강점이 드러나지 않아요.

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

💸Expense ratio is somewhat high — 0.65% annually
📈Long-term returns trail the average
🎯Trails benchmark by -7.0%p annually

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

광범위 시장 분산

150개 종목에 고루 분산되어 있어 안정적인 편이에요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

150개

상위 10개 비중

64.8%

최대 단일 종목

12.70%

집중도(HHI)

758

보통

⚠️ 소수 종목·섹터에 집중되어 있어, 해당 종목/섹터가 흔들리면 ETF 전체가 크게 영향을 받아요.

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

85.7% +56%p

Communication Services

32.0% +23%p

Consumer Cyclical

27.1% +17%p

Industrials

14.6% +7%p

Financial

11.6%

Healthcare

3.9% -7%p

Consumer Defensive

1.1% -5%p

Energy

0.1% -4%p

S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 64.8% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 NVDA NVIDIA Corp.

12.70%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA CORP

11.90%

#3 GOOG ALPHABET INC

5.71%

#4 GOOGL Alphabet Inc.

5.34%

MSBT MORGAN STANLEY INSTITUTIONAL LIQUIDITY FUNDS

5.08%

#6 MSFT Microsoft Corp.

5.06%

#7 MSFT MICROSOFT CORP

4.84%

#8 AMZN Amazon.com, Inc.

4.84%

#9 META Meta Platforms Inc

4.66%

#10 META META PLATFORMS INC

4.63%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Broad Market & Size

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Broad Market & Size

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 AFGR보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 AFGR보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
AFGR	First Trust Active Factor Large Cap Growth ETF	0.65%	$91M	74	-	+0.59%	+2.95%
VOO	Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	0.03% ▲	$982.4B ▲	519	1.08%	-	+16.32% ▲
IVV	iShares Core S&P 500 ETF	0.03% ▲	$866.0B ▲	509	1.10%	-	+16.30% ▲
SPY	SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust	0.09% ▲	$785.2B ▲	505	1.02%	-	+16.32% ▲
VTI	Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF	0.03% ▲	$658.5B ▲	3544	1.07%	-	+16.71% ▲
QQQ	Invesco QQQ Trust Series 1	0.18% ▲	$452.0B ▲	105	0.45%	-	+18.89% ▲

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ AFGR보다 유리 · ▼ AFGR보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

9 ETFs tracking the same theme as AFGR using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 4 · Inverse 1 · Covered Call 4)

Not direct derivatives of AFGR, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with AFGR, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 4 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)