ACSV 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

ACSV

American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF

7월 28일 3:53 PM ET (한국 7/29 04:53)

$50.05

+0.35 ▲ +0.72%

🌙 7월 28일 4:04 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:04)

$50.05

+0.00 +0.00%

ACSV ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.49%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$19M

약 255억원

Holdings

201 items

Dividend Yield

0.80%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - US Style	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	201	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.23%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equities	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$19M	Perf Month ⓘ	0.67%
Expense ⓘ	0.49%	NAV ⓘ	$49.64	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.84%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	7.87%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.4 (0.8%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	31.1%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	16.66%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	11.17%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	109.75%	Return% SI ⓘ	34.68%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.45% 0.4%	Perf YTD ⓘ	22.89%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.85%	SMA50 ⓘ	3.69%	SMA200 ⓘ	13.45%	RSI (14) ⓘ	59.13	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/10/16	Prev Close ⓘ	$49.7	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$50.05

📊 American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF (ACSV) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF · US Equities - US Style

가치주형 — 저평가된 가치주 중심 포트폴리오

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF seeks long-term capital growth. Under normal market conditions, it invests at least 80% of its net assets in small-cap stocks. The portfolio managers use a bottom-up stock selection process that combines proprietary fundamental research with risk-aware systematic portfolio construction, focusing primarily on high-quality U.S. small-cap stocks trading at a discount to their fair value. It seeks to identify small- and mid-cap companies whose share prices do not fully reflect their intrinsic business value.

U.S.equitysmall-capvalue

규모: $19M 약 255억원
운용사: American Century
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Average expense ratio — 0.49% annually

Mid-range within the US Equities - US Style category.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

평균권

0.49%

My positionMid-range

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$490K

Pay $70K more per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$420K

Based on expense ratio of 0.42%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$8.8M

9.1% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF

0.04%

-0.45%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.40%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-7.4%

Drawdown duration: 1 months

2026-02-06 → 2026-03-20

Recovered in about 24 days

2025-10-16 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

2.11

Excellent — Strong risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Pays dividends, but at a relatively low rate — 0.80% annually

Closer to a blend of growth and dividends.

ℹ️ Dividends are a secondary source of performance; the main expected return comes from share-price appreciation.

배당수익률

0.80%

주당 배당

$0.40

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

반기배당

3월 · 12월

📊 총 이력 2025~2026 (2건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

$0.17

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 2건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-03-10

$0.067

—

0.57%

2025-12-16

$0.175

—

0.42%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $679

5년 누적 (세후) $3K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Strengths and weaknesses both present Check the fit below to see whether it matches your investing goal.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

낮음

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Value investors

✅ 강점

🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

201개 종목에 넓게 분산

개별 종목 리스크가 분산되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

201개

상위 10개 비중

18.6%

최대 단일 종목

2.22%

집중도(HHI)

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Financial

20.3% +7%p

Technology

13.5% -17%p

Energy

11.4% +7%p

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

Industrials

8.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%

Real Estate

5.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%

Healthcare

4.7% -6%p

Communication Services

1.0% -8%p

S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 18.6% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

MTH Meritage Homes Corp

2.22%

ONB Old National Bancorp/IN

1.99%

NOG Northern Oil & Gas Inc

1.98%

PFS Provident Financial Services Inc

1.94%

COLB Columbia Banking System Inc

1.83%

AUB Atlantic Union Bankshares Corp

1.78%

WBS Webster Financial Corp

1.76%

EVTC EVERTEC Inc

1.74%

TRNO Terreno Realty Corp

1.73%

#10

UBSI United Bankshares Inc/WV

1.66%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - US Style

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 6/6위

카테고리: US Equities - US Style

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 ACSV보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 ACSV보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
ACSV	American Century Small Cap Value Insights ETF	0.49%	$19M	201	0.80%	+22.89%	-
VTV	Vanguard Value ETF	0.03% ▲	$189.1B ▲	325	1.83% ▲	-	+24.06%
IWD	iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF	0.18% ▲	$81.2B ▲	875	1.39% ▲	-	+27.16%
IVE	iShares S&P 500 Value ETF	0.18% ▲	$49.1B ▲	444	1.51% ▲	-	+17.40%
VBR	Vanguard Small Cap Value ETF	0.05% ▲	$37.4B ▲	844	1.74% ▲	-	+22.57%
SPYV	State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF	0.04% ▲	$36.3B ▲	440	1.67% ▲	-	+17.24%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ ACSV보다 유리 · ▼ ACSV보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

8 ETFs tracking the same theme as ACSV using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 5 · Inverse 3)

Not direct derivatives of ACSV, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with ACSV, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 5 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)