AAUA 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

AAUA

Alpha Architect US Equity 3 ETF

7월 28일 9:46 AM ET (한국 7/28 22:46)

$56.41

+0.06 ▲ +0.10%

🌙 7월 28일 4:10 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:10)

$56.60

+0.19 ▲ +0.33%

AAUA ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.09%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$367M

약 5022억원

Holdings

353 items

Dividend Yield

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental	Asset Type ⓘ	Equities (Stocks)	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	353	Perf Week ⓘ	-0.46%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Equity Income	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$367M	Perf Month ⓘ	1.3%
Expense ⓘ	0.09%	NAV ⓘ	$56.39	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-2.45%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	4.34%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	-	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	19.93%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-
Flows% 1M ⓘ	0.02%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	-1.25%	Return% SI ⓘ	41.02%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.07% 0.11%	Perf YTD ⓘ	13.87%
SMA20 ⓘ	-1.02%	SMA50 ⓘ	-0.48%	SMA200 ⓘ	2.76%	RSI (14) ⓘ	46.07	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2026/3/19	Prev Close ⓘ	$56.35	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.00M	Price ⓘ	$56.41

📊 Alpha Architect US Equity 3 ETF (AAUA) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Alpha Architect US Equity 3 ETF · US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental

배당 인컴형 — 꾸준한 배당 수익 목적의 배당주 바구니

The Alpha Architect US Equity 3 ETF provides broad exposure to the U.S. equity market by actively investing in a diverse range of U.S. companies with market capitalizations of $1 billion or more, while also employing a proprietary dividend timing strategy. The fund rotates into stocks ex-dividend just before their ex-dividend dates to capture short-term price dislocations, aiming to maintain market beta while reducing taxable distributions to investors.

📘 AAUA ETF 자세히 알아보기 →

U.S.equitymid-large-capmulti-sector

규모: $367M 약 5022억원
운용사: Alpha Architect
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2026년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Low-cost ETF — 0.09% annually

상위 25% within US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental. For a ₩100M investment, roughly ₩90,000/year.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 25%

0.09%

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$90K

Save $360K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$450K

Based on expense ratio of 0.45%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$1.6M

1.7% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

VIG

Vanguard Dividend Appreciation FTF

0.04%

-0.05%p annually

VYM

Vanguard High Dividend Yield Indx ETF

0.04%

-0.05%p annually

DIVB

iShares Core Dividend ETF

0.05%

-0.04%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Low Risk

Less volatile than the market average, making it relatively easy to hold over time.

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 5%

±0.11%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-5.9%

Drawdown duration: 0 months

2026-03-19 → 2026-03-30

Recovered in about 9 days

2026-03-19 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

2.29

Excellent — Strong risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Overall attractive Key metrics look solid, and the strengths outweigh the weak spots.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

적합

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

매우 적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

보통

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors who want consistent dividend income

✅ 강점

💸Low cost — 0.09% annually
🛡️Very low volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

배당주 중심 포트폴리오

주로 배당을 꾸준히 지급하는 기업들로 구성되어 있어요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

826개

상위 10개 비중

37.1%

최대 단일 종목

7.75%

집중도(HHI)

205

낮음 (분산)

🥧 섹터 비중

Technology

33.4% +3%p

Financial

16.6% +4%p

Communication Services

10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%

Industrials

7.7%

Healthcare

7.2% -4%p

Consumer Defensive

2.2% -4%p

Energy

1.3%

Utilities

1.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%

Real Estate

0.3%

S&P 500보다 많이 투자 (+3%p 이상) S&P 500보다 적게 투자 (-3%p 이상)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 37.1% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 AAPL Apple Inc

7.75%

#2 NVDA NVIDIA Corp

6.96%

#3 MSFT Microsoft Corp

3.53%

#4 META Meta Platforms Inc

3.50%

#5 AVGO Broadcom Inc

3.27%

#6 GOOGL Alphabet Inc

2.80%

MYMK State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust

2.68%

AAUS Alpha Architect US Equity ETF

2.52%

#9 CVNA Carvana Co

2.24%

#10 AMZN Amazon.com Inc

1.81%

Category Peers

Category: US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 4/6위

카테고리: US Equities - Dividend & Fundamental

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 AAUA보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 AAUA보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
AAUA	Alpha Architect US Equity 3 ETF	0.09%	$367M	353	-	+13.87%	-
VIG	Vanguard Dividend Appreciation FTF	0.04% ▲	$111.1B ▲	341	1.49%	-	+14.70%
SCHD	Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF	0.06% ▲	$102.6B ▲	111	3.13%	-	+22.36%
VYM	Vanguard High Dividend Yield Indx ETF	0.04% ▲	$81.5B ▲	618	2.23%	-	+19.13%
DFAC	Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF	0.17% ▼	$47.5B ▲	2554	0.91%	-	+19.26%
RDVY	First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	0.47% ▼	$24.5B ▲	72	0.84%	-	+25.24%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ AAUA보다 유리 · ▼ AAUA보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

4 ETFs tracking the same theme as AAUA using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 3 · Covered Call 1)

Not direct derivatives of AAUA, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with AAUA, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 3 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)