AAAC 주가 전망 및 ETF 분석 - 배당·운용보수·보유종목·NAV·RSI·MACD

AAAC

Columbia AAA CLO ETF

7월 23일 11:25 AM ET (한국 7/24 24:25)

$20.08

+0.00 +0.00%

🌙 7월 28일 4:00 PM ET (한국 7/29 05:00)

$20.08

+0.00 +0.00%

AAAC ETF is analyzed across 10 metrics including expense ratio, holdings, sector allocation, dividends, RSI, and MACD.

Total Expense Ratio

0.2%

Annual operating cost

Net Assets (AUM)

$103M

약 1415억원

Holdings

94 items

Dividend Yield

2.65%

Management Style

Active

Category ⓘ	Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities	Asset Type ⓘ	Bonds	Return% 1Y ⓘ	-	Total Holdings ⓘ	94	Perf Week ⓘ	0.05%
ETF Type ⓘ	US Bonds	Active/Passive ⓘ	Active	Return% 3Y ⓘ	-	AUM ⓘ	$103M	Perf Month ⓘ	-0.1%
Expense ⓘ	0.2%	NAV ⓘ	$20.06	Return% 5Y ⓘ	-	52W High ⓘ	-0.52%	Perf Quarter ⓘ	0.1%
Dividend TTM ⓘ	$0.53 (2.65%)	Div Gr. 3/5Y ⓘ	-	Return% 10Y ⓘ	-	52W Low ⓘ	0.78%	Perf Half Y ⓘ	-0.35%
Flows% 1M ⓘ	914.42%	Flows% YTD ⓘ	914.42%	Return% SI ⓘ	4.8%	Volatility(W/M) ⓘ	0.01% 0.04%	Perf YTD ⓘ	0.1%
SMA20 ⓘ	0.12%	SMA50 ⓘ	0.1%	SMA200 ⓘ	0.13%	RSI (14) ⓘ	61.46	Beta ⓘ	-
IPO ⓘ	2025/12/11	Prev Close ⓘ	$20.08	Perf Year ⓘ	-	Avg Volume ⓘ	0.08M	Price ⓘ	$20.08

📊 Columbia AAA CLO ETF (AAAC) Investment Analysis

ETF Overview

Columbia AAA CLO ETF · Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities

채권형 — 채권 ETF (만기 미상)

2025년 상장, 1년 운영 중.

The Columbia AAA CLO ETF primarily invests in AAA-rated tranches of collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), seeking high current income and capital preservation. Its strategy centers on fundamental credit analysis of CLO managers and the underlying loan collateral, using short-duration floating-rate bonds to respond to the interest rate environment.

U.S.fixed-incomebondsdebt-securities

규모: $103M 약 1415억원
운용사: Columbia
운용 방식: 액티브 (운용사 재량)
상장일: 2025년

Cost Efficiency

Annual Expense Ratio · Category Rank · Long-Term Cost Impact

Low-cost ETF — 0.2% annually

상위 25% within Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities. For a ₩100M investment, roughly ₩200,000/year.

Effective Annual Expense Ratio (Net Expense Ratio)

상위 25%

0.2%

My positionTop 25%

Low range Average High range

Actual Cost Simulation by Investment Amount

$100.0M

Annual Expense Ratio

$200K

Save $130K per year vs. category average

Category Median Annual Cost

$330K

Based on expense ratio of 0.33%

10-Year Cumulative Expense Ratio (Long-term simulation assuming 7% annual market growth)

$3.6M

3.8% of returns you could have earned goes to the fund manager due to fees

💡 Because the expense ratio takes a slice of your assets every year, costs compound over 10 years and result in far greater losses than a simple sum (annual fee × 10). The 7% annual return assumption is based on the S&P 500's long-term average.

Defaults shown against $100K baseline portfolio. Adjust the slider to update the amount in real time.

Cheaper alternatives in the same category

Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF

0.19%

-0.01%p annually

* A lower fee does not necessarily mean a better ETF. Consider the tracked index, liquidity, and tax treatment as well.

Long-Term Performance

1-year · 3-year · 5-year · 10-year returns · vs. benchmark · drawdown defense

Insufficient return data

This ETF is either too recently listed or does not yet have enough disclosed return data. Please refer to ETFs that have been operating for more than one year.

Risk Profile

Volatility · Beta · Max Drawdown · Sharpe · Drawdown Recovery History

Overall Risk Grade

Bond Benchmark

Bond ETFs are naturally less volatile than stocks, so it only makes sense to compare them with other bond ETFs. You should also factor in the inverse relationship between interest rates and bond prices.

🏦 Bond ETFs — Low volatility and low Beta are the norm

Bonds have far lower volatility than stocks, and a lower Beta versus equity benchmarks. An "stable" rating is the natural result; meaningful comparison should be made against bond indices (e.g., AGG/TLT).

Average daily range (last 1 month)

상위 25%

±0.04%

S&P 500 typically ±1.0~1.3% · Bond funds ±0.3% · Leveraged ETFs ±3% or more

Annual volatility trend (past 10 years)

ℹ️ This ETF's average daily price swing. 1% means "on average, moves about ±1% per day." The rolling curve below shows the annualized volatility (long-term standard measure) over time.

Max Drawdown · Past 10 years

-0.6%

Drawdown duration: 0 months

2026-02-23 → 2026-03-06

Recovered in about 25 days

2025-12-11 Worst -5% 2026-07-01

ℹ️ Maximum drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough decline in the past. It represents the worst-case loss a long-term investor must psychologically endure.

Sharpe Ratio (Risk-Adjusted Return)

0.46

Weak — Low risk-adjusted returns

ℹ️ Annualized return minus the risk-free rate (3% annualized), divided by annualized volatility. A value above 1.0 is generally considered good risk-adjusted performance.

Dividend Analysis

Yield · Dividend history · After-tax income calculator

Bond distribution — 2.65% annually

Coupon interest is the primary source.

ℹ️ Bond ETF distributions are mostly coupon income. Distributions may rise when interest rates increase, but this should be considered alongside the resulting price decline.

배당수익률

2.65%

주당 배당

$0.53

연간 기준

5년 성장률

지급 주기

분기배당

2월 · 3월 · 4월 · 12월

📊 총 이력 2025~2026 (4건)

연도별 배당 총액 추이

주당 배당금을 연 단위로 합산한 금액입니다. 막대가 우상향이면 매년 배당이 늘어나고 있다는 뜻입니다.

—

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

$0.01

2025

$X.XX 그 해 총 배당금 +X% 전년 대비 증가 -X% 감소

최근 배당 이력 총 4건

아래로 스크롤하면 과거 배당 이력을 볼 수 있습니다.

배당락일

주당 금액

지급일

당시 수익률

2026-04-01

$0.081

—

1.47%

2026-03-02

$0.074

—

1.06%

2026-02-02

$0.134

—

0.69%

2025-12-29

$0.005

—

0.02%

* "배당락일"은 배당받으려면 이 날 이전에 주식을 보유해야 하는 기준일입니다. 지급일·당시 수익률은 일부 종목에서 데이터가 없을 수 있습니다.

💰 내가 $100K 투자한다면

연간 배당금 (세후) $2K

5년 누적 (세후) $11K

* 환율 1 가정, 배당소득세 15% 반영. 5년 누적은 배당 성장률 연 0% 가정.

* Qualified dividend middle-bracket approximation. Actual rate varies by total income.

Overall investment appeal

What this ETF fits best — strengths, weaknesses, and target investor profile

Overall attractive Key metrics look solid, and the strengths outweigh the weak spots.

🎯 목적별 적합도

내가 이 ETF를 어떤 목적으로 활용할 수 있는지 확인하세요.

🌳

장기 보유

수년 이상 꾸준히 모아갈 때

보통

💵

배당 인컴

매월·분기 현금흐름이 목적일 때

적합

⚡

단기 트레이딩

며칠~몇 주 단기 방향성 매매

매우 낮음

🧩

포트폴리오 보조

자산 배분·헤지 용도

매우 적합

👤

이런 분에게 어울려요

Investors seeking portfolio stability

✅ 강점

💸Low cost — 0.2% annually
🛡️Below-average volatility

⚠️ 약점·주의사항

특별한 약점이 보이지 않아요.

Portfolio Composition

What's actually inside — sector weights and top holdings

채권 포트폴리오

주식과 달리 "섹터 = 만기·신용등급"으로 해석해야 해요.

ℹ️ 왜 구성을 봐야 하나요?

ETF의 실제 성과는 담고 있는 종목과 섹터에서 나와요. 이름이 "S&P 500"이라도 기술주 비중이 유난히 높을 수 있고, "배당주 ETF"라도 몇몇 대형주에 쏠려 있을 수 있어요. 라벨보다 실제 구성을 확인하는 게 중요해요.

🔬 집중도 한눈에 보기

총 보유종목

37개

상위 10개 비중

33.6%

최대 단일 종목

4.99%

집중도(HHI)

281

낮음 (분산)

📋 상위 보유 종목 Top 10 Top 10이 전체의 33.6% 차지

티커 옆의 점 색상 = 섹터 구분 (섹터 차트와 동일 색상)

#1 - Carlyle Global Market Strategies

4.99%

#2 - Elmwood CLO 23 Ltd

3.99%

#3 - AGL CLO Ltd.

3.98%

#4 - ARES CLO Ltd

3.94%

#5 - Madison Park Funding Ltd

3.19%

#6 - Oak Hill Credit Partners

3.00%

#7 - Dryden Senior Loan Fund

2.99%

#8 - Aimco

2.50%

#9 - Magnetite CLO Ltd

2.50%

#10 - Neuberger Berman CLO Ltd

2.50%

Category Peers

Category: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities

같은 카테고리 6종 중 AUM 6/6위 · 보수율 2/6위

카테고리: Bonds - Non Government Asset Backed Securities

ℹ️ 왜 비교해야 하나요?

같은 카테고리 ETF끼리는 보수율·규모(AUM)·배당률을 비교해 볼 가치가 있어요. 보수율은 낮을수록 장기 수익에 유리하고, AUM이 크면 운용 안정성이 높아요. ▲ 표시는 AAAC보다 유리, ▼ 표시는 AAAC보다 불리를 뜻해요.

티커	ETF명	보수율	AUM	보유종목	배당률	YTD	1년
AAAC	Columbia AAA CLO ETF	0.2%	$103M	94	2.65%	+0.10%	-
JAAA	Janus Henderson AAA CLO ETF	0.2%	$29.2B ▲	596	4.94% ▲	-	-0.20%
PAAA	PGIM AAA CLO ETF	0.19% ▲	$11.2B ▲	318	4.83% ▲	-	-0.02%
FSEC	Fidelity Investment Grade Securitized ETF	0.36% ▼	$4.6B ▲	1151	4.45% ▲	-	+0.74%
CLOA	iShares AAA CLO Active ETF	0.2%	$2.2B ▲	411	4.89% ▲	-	+0.11%
CLOI	VanEck CLO ETF	0.36% ▼	$1.5B ▲	183	5.26% ▲	-	-0.08%

AUM 내림차순 정렬 · ▲ AAAC보다 유리 · ▼ AAAC보다 불리

Leveraged & Covered Call ETFs on the Same Theme

ETFs that approach the same theme with a different strategy

9 ETFs tracking the same theme as AAAC using leveraged or covered call strategies (Leverage 2 · Inverse 3 · Covered Call 4)

Not direct derivatives of AAAC, but ETFs that cover the same theme via a different strategy.

ℹ️ Which ETFs are included?

Among ETFs whose theme (category or sector) overlaps with AAAC, some use special strategies. Leveraged ETFs aim for 2–3× the daily move, Inverse ETFs seek opposite-direction returns, and Covered Call ETFs generate monthly income from option premiums.

⚠️ Caution: Long-Term Holding

Leveraged and inverse ETFs track only the daily return. With high volatility, holding them for longer periods causes cumulative volatility decay—returns diverge further from the underlying index. They are meant for short-term trading.

📈 Leverage 2 ETFs that amplify the same theme by 2-3x (high volatility)