VSMV ETF: What Is It? Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs at a Glance
The Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) is a core-style product that selects stocks using fundamental factors to lower portfolio volatility. Differences in management fees and dividends versus low-volatility ETFs such as USMV and SPLV are the key selection criteria.
What Is the Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF?
This is a US large- and mid-cap ETF that tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. It uses a two-step management approach: it first selects stocks based on fundamental factors, then adjusts weights to lower the volatility of the portfolio as a whole.
It suits core-oriented, long-term investors who want to diversify across US equities while reducing volatility exposure.
It is an actively managed ETF run by Victory Capital.
How Does the Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | Nasdaq Victory US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index |
| Management Approach | Rules-based multi-factor + volatility adjustment |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Regular rebalancing |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly dividends |
| Manager | Victory Capital |
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% |
The fund first screens US large- and mid-cap stocks using fundamental factors such as profitability, momentum, and valuation, then adjusts weights at the portfolio level to reduce volatility. The core of its approach is combining multiple factors with volatility constraints rather than relying on a single factor.
- A two-step approach combining multi-factor selection with volatility adjustment
- Broad US equity exposure that includes mid caps in addition to large caps
Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $163.9M, and the expense ratio is 0.35% per year.
Unlike products that track only a single low-volatility index, this fund adds an extra factor-selection step, so its fees are somewhat higher than those of a simple passive core product.
Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF Performance and Trends
Given the nature of minimum-volatility strategies, gains may be limited relative to broad indexes during market rallies, while drawdowns tend to be comparatively mild in downturns. Results may nonetheless vary depending on the market environment.
When volatility rises, money tends to flow into low-volatility and defensive ETFs, whereas in strong risk-on environments, capital can also shift toward broad growth-oriented products.
Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF Pros and Cons
Its strength is a multi-factor design that lowers volatility; its drawbacks are fees somewhat higher than core passive funds and limited participation in rising markets.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF Alternative ETFs and Related Products
Comparable products in the same low-volatility and minimum-volatility category shown in the table include USMV and SPLV, which are lower-fee, large-cap-focused passive products. You may also consider FDLO, which tracks a fundamentals-based low-volatility factor, LGLV, which focuses on large-cap low volatility, and XMLV, which offers exposure to mid-cap low volatility. If you want broader US core exposure, the market-cap-weighted VOO is also an alternative.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | $102.93 | -0.2% | $24.1B | 0.15% | 1.37% | +10.4% | |
| Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF | $76.57 | +0.3% | $7.5B | 0.25% | 2.16% | +8.1% | |
| Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | $74.53 | -0.1% | $1.5B | 0.15% | 1.34% | +13.2% | |
| State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | $188.23 | +0.2% | $1.2B | 0.12% | 2.06% | +8.9% | |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | $66.05 | +0.1% | $726.5M | 0.25% | 3.02% | +7.2% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 0.19% | $344.63 | -1.2% | $5.03T | 39.5 | 0.32% |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 0.11% | $239.11 | -6.0% | $298.7B | 35.6 | 0.55% |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 0.07% | $157.91 | -5.7% | $206.1B | 39.5 | 0.59% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 0.06% | $279.84 | -1.4% | $3.41T | 14.6 | 0.31% |
| JNJ | Johnson & Johnson | 0.05% | $273.20 | -0.7% | $657.7B | 41.4 | 1.96% |
| XOM | ExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 0.04% | $187.25 | +2.2% | $770.0B | 24.1 | 2.22% |
| QCOM | Qualcomm Inc | 0.04% | $164.79 | -11.1% | $176.0B | 19.1 | 2.2% |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 0.04% | $123.51 | +1.9% | $979.9B | 44.8 | 0.81% |
Victory Shares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in VSMV. Although it is a core-style product aimed at reducing volatility, it is best to check its fees relative to simple passive core products, its relative performance in bull markets, and the currency exposure for Korean-won investors before buying.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the cost burden relative to simple passive core products | Somewhat high |
| 📉 Volatility Profile | Understand the design that prioritizes downside protection | Low-volatility oriented |
| 📈 Participation in Rising Markets | Review relative performance in bull markets | May be limited |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Impact on returns converted to won | No currency hedge |
Minimum-volatility strategies aim to provide protection in market downturns but do not prevent losses, and they may lag in bull markets. In periods when factor effects weaken, the expected differentiation may not materialize.
It is a suitable choice for investors who want a US equity core while reducing volatility exposure. If cost matters more, it is advisable to compare USMV and SPLV, and if broad market exposure is more important, VOO as well, before deciding.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 25, 2026.