VEGN ETF Explained: Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings & Alternative ETFs
The US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) is a US large-cap ESG ETF that excludes companies involved in animal exploitation, fossil fuels, and environmental harm. It tracks the Beyond Investing US Vegan Climate Index, and its expense ratio, dividends, and differences versus broad ESG ETFs are the key selection criteria.
What is the US Vegan Climate ETF?
It is a thematic ESG ETF that tracks the Beyond Investing US Vegan Climate Index. From approximately 500 large-cap names in the Solactive US Large-Cap Index, it screens out companies linked to animal exploitation, fossil fuels, environmental damage, and human rights violations, then holds the remaining large-caps weighted by market capitalization.
It is well suited for long-term investors who want to reflect vegan and climate values in their portfolios while diversifying across US large-cap stocks.
The ETF is managed passively (index-tracking) by Beyond Investing.
Here's the rewritten sentence: "How does the US Vegan Climate ETF work?"| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | Beyond Investing US Vegan Climate Index |
| Management Style | Passive (Index-Tracking) |
| Rebalancing Cycle | Periodic Adjustments per Index Rules |
| Dividend Schedule | Quarterly Dividends |
| Manager | Beyond Investing |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60% |
Starting from the Solactive US Large-Cap Index, the fund applies ESG screens that exclude companies tied to animal exploitation, fossil fuels, environmental damage, and human rights violations. The remaining holdings are replicated in full and weighted by market capitalization, with a cap rule applied to limit excessive concentration in any single name.
- Clear vegan and climate screening criteria that exclude animal exploitation and fossil fuels
- Single-name weight caps that mitigate concentration risk
Size and Cost of the US Vegan Climate ETF (AUM & Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $170.7M, and the total expense ratio is 0.60% annually.
Because its exclusion criteria are stricter than those of broad ESG ETFs, the holdings differ accordingly, and the expense ratio tends to run somewhat higher than core ESG products due to its thematic nature.
Performance and Flows of the US Vegan Climate ETF
Performance broadly tracks the overall US large-cap market, though the exclusion of fossil fuels and certain sectors can create trend divergences versus the broad index. Short-term moves are shaped by interest rates, the earnings season, and the fund's tech-sector weight.
Fund flows rise and fall with demand for ESG and thematic investing, and the product tends to be sensitive to investor interest in vegan and climate values as well as the broader ESG market environment. As a thematic fund, flow volatility is typically greater than that of core ETFs.
Strengths and Weaknesses of the US Vegan Climate ETF
Its clear vegan and climate exclusion framework is a differentiator, while its somewhat higher expense ratio and smaller asset base are notable drawbacks.
Key Strengths
Points to Watch
Broad ESG core ETFs such as ESGU and ESGV come with lower expense ratios and apply looser exclusion screens than VEGN, resulting in different holdings. Investors may also look at DSI, which tracks a socially responsible screening index, SUSA, which uses an ESG tilt-weighting approach, and USCA, which focuses on climate action. Each differs in screening criteria and fee level.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares Trust iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA ETF | $164.12 | -0.3% | $17.6B | 0.15% | 0.94% | +9.8% | |
| Vanguard ESG U.S. Stock ETF | $132.24 | -0.5% | $13.1B | 0.09% | 0.9% | +9.3% | |
| iShares ESG MSCI KLD 400 ETF | $139.80 | -0.9% | $5.3B | 0.25% | 0.91% | +8.4% | |
| iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF | $153.93 | -0.3% | $4.0B | 0.25% | 0.84% | +10.7% | |
| Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF | $44.59 | -0.5% | $3.3B | 0.07% | 1.07% | +6.1% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 0.12% | $725.11 | -1.1% | $820.4B | 9.8 | 0.1% |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.10% | $515.21 | +1.3% | $845.0B | 112.0 | - |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 0.05% | $287.38 | -0.3% | $3.50T | 15.0 | 0.3% |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 0.05% | $331.98 | +3.9% | $1.58T | 42.4 | 0.79% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 0.04% | $348.51 | -0.6% | $5.06T | 38.8 | 0.33% |
| CSCO | Cisco Systems Inc | 0.04% | $98.15 | -0.5% | $386.4B | 29.5 | 1.74% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 0.04% | $168.89 | -5.5% | $4.07T | 21.4 | 0.46% |
| UNH | Unitedhealth Group Inc | 0.04% | $405.12 | +1.9% | $363.0B | 23.1 | 2.22% |
Investor Checklist for the US Vegan Climate ETF
Before investing in VEGN, consider the following points. Because it is a vegan and climate-themed ETF, it is worth reviewing which screens are used, the expense ratio and asset size, and whether the product's values align with your own investment principles.
| Checkpoint | What to Confirm | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | Impact of cumulative costs over a long holding period | Somewhat higher than core peers |
| Exclusion Criteria | Whether the vegan and climate screens match your values | Clearly defined criteria applied |
| Asset Size | Liquidity and bid-ask spread | Small to mid-sized |
| Currency | Effect on won-denominated returns | Unhedged |
Because this is a thematic product, its smaller asset base and somewhat higher expense ratio, along with the exclusion of fossil fuels and other sectors, can produce performance gaps versus the broad market. These are the main risk factors.
For long-term investors who want to embed vegan and climate values in their portfolios, this is a well-suited thematic ESG ETF. If cost and diversification come first, a broad ESG core ETF may be preferable; if a clear ethical exclusion framework is the priority, VEGN is worth considering.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 19, 2026.