What Is the USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF ($UMI)? — Total Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF (UMI) is an active income fund that invests in midstream infrastructure companies such as oil and gas pipelines. Monthly distributions, an infrastructure cash-flow structure, and strategic differences from related products such as EMLP, MLPX, and EINC are the key selection criteria.
What Is the USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF?
An active ETF that pursues high distribution yield by investing in midstream energy infrastructure companies and master limited partnerships that operate oil and gas pipelines, storage, and processing facilities. It provides exposure to stable infrastructure cash flows.
It is well suited for income-oriented investors who pursue high distribution yield from energy infrastructure while accepting the concentration risk and volatility of the energy sector.
The fund is actively managed by USCF.
How Does the USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Investment Focus | Midstream infrastructure and master limited partnerships |
| Management Style | Active (infrastructure selection) |
| Primary Objective | Stable distribution yield |
| Distribution Frequency | Monthly |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69% |
The fund pursues high distribution yield by investing in midstream energy infrastructure companies and master limited partnerships that operate oil and gas pipelines, storage, and processing facilities. Because midstream infrastructure cash flows are driven more by fee-based revenue tied to transport and processing volumes than by raw material prices, the fund takes an active approach aimed at delivering relatively stable distributions.
- Midstream infrastructure-focused investments
- Exposure to fee-based cash flows
USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF — Size and Cost (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $554.1M, with a total expense ratio of 0.69% annually.
The main comparison points against similar midstream and MLP ETFs such as EMLP and MLPX are the management approach and infrastructure composition.
USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF — Performance and Flows
Midstream infrastructure is driven not only by crude oil and natural gas prices but also by transport and processing volumes and infrastructure demand, which tends to deliver relatively stable distribution flows compared with sharp swings in commodity prices. However, because the fund is concentrated in the energy sector, it can be shaken during sharp oil price declines.
Energy income products see inflows and outflows shift with the oil price outlook and interest-rate environment, and demand chasing high distribution yield can move capital into this product category. Performance also varies with the energy cycle and changes in infrastructure policy, a point worth monitoring.
USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF — Strengths and Weaknesses
Stable infrastructure cash flows and high distribution yield are strengths, while energy sector concentration, sensitivity to oil prices, and the active management fee are considerations.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF — Alternative ETFs and Related Products
For direct exposure to midstream master limited partnerships, AMLP and MLPA are direct alternatives, while investors seeking broader energy equity exposure may compare sector ETFs such as XLE. The three products shown in the table — EMLP, MLPX, and EINC — all invest in energy infrastructure and MLPs but differ in sponsor and composition. This ETF's differentiation lies in its active management of midstream infrastructure to pursue distribution yield.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | $44.62 | +0.0% | $4.3B | 0.95% | 2.75% | +18.3% | |
| Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | $76.53 | -0.2% | $3.8B | 0.45% | 4% | +30.9% | |
| NEOS MLP & Energy Infrastructure High Income ETF | $53.91 | -0.1% | $965.3M | 0.68% | 13.45% | - | |
| VanEck Energy Income ETF | $123.39 | +0.2% | $84.8M | 0.46% | 3.27% | +34.5% | |
| Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | $30.84 | +0.2% | $66.8M | 0.75% | 3.76% | +33.9% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ET | Energy Transfer LP | 0.16% | $20.91 | +0.1% | $72.0B | 14.3 | 6.55% |
| EPD | Enterprise Products Partners L P | 0.15% | $38.15 | -2.3% | $82.4B | 12.7 | 5.88% |
| WMB | Williams Cos Inc | 0.15% | $74.35 | -0.7% | $90.9B | 29.7 | 2.84% |
| ENB | Enbridge Inc | 0.14% | $49.46 | +0.4% | $112.2B | 26.3 | 5.59% |
| TRGP | Targa Resources Corp | 0.07% | $314.99 | +0.8% | $67.5B | 30.1 | 1.58% |
| KMI | Kinder Morgan Inc | 0.07% | $33.87 | -0.3% | $75.5B | 21.0 | 3.51% |
USCF Midstream Energy Income ETF — Investor Checklist
These are the key points to review before investing in UMI. Stable infrastructure cash flows are attractive, but sector concentration, oil price sensitivity, and the management fee should be confirmed in advance. It is also advisable to compare with similar midstream and MLP products.
| Checkpoint | What to Verify | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Distribution Yield | Check distribution rate and sustainability | Relatively high |
| Oil Price Sensitivity | Check oil prices, volumes, and infrastructure demand | Relatively sensitive |
| Portfolio Composition | Check weights in infrastructure and master limited partnerships | Midstream-concentrated |
| Expense Ratio | Check level of active management fee | Somewhat high |
Crude oil and natural gas price moves, transport volumes, and energy policy changes are the main short-term performance variables, and concentration in a single sector, energy, can produce sharp drawdowns during broad market sell-offs. Even though infrastructure cash flows are relatively stable, sector risk remains.
This fund is a strong candidate for income-oriented investors seeking high distribution yield from energy infrastructure. Investors who want to focus on master limited partnerships should compare it with products such as AMLP and MLPA, while those who prefer active midstream infrastructure management should weigh this fund against those alternatives.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 10, 2026.