TMFS ETF Explained: Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF, TMFS, is an actively managed fund that selects U.S. small-cap growth stocks. Investors should weigh the volatility created by its concentrated, non-diversified structure alongside its lack of a distribution history, expense burden, and the outlook for small-cap stocks.
What Is the Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF?
TMFS is an actively managed ETF that does not track a specific index. Instead, it selects U.S. small-cap companies with growth characteristics and pursues long-term capital appreciation through a relatively concentrated portfolio.
It provides selective access to U.S. small-cap growth stocks and is suited to long-term investors who can tolerate stock-specific and market volatility.
TMFS is actively managed by Motley Fool.
How to Invest in the Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Index Tracked | Active management, no index tracking |
| Management Style | Active stock selection |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Adjusted based on manager judgment |
| Distribution Schedule | No distribution history |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85% |
TMFS selects holdings from U.S. small-cap stocks with growth characteristics by evaluating qualitative competitive advantages and long-term growth potential. Because the portfolio can be relatively concentrated, individual stock picks can have an outsized impact on the fund's performance.
- Active small-cap growth stock selection
- Concentrated management with a non-diversified structure
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF Size and Costs (AUM · Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $56.2M, and the total expense ratio is 0.85% per year.
Because TMFS is an actively managed fund concentrated in small-cap growth stocks, it is important to interpret not only the cost level but also trading liquidity and the influence of individual holdings.
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF Performance and Fund Flows
TMFS returns can be highly sensitive to small-cap growth earnings expectations, the interest-rate environment, and shifts in risk-asset appetite. Combined with its concentrated management style, stock-specific factors can weigh more heavily on performance than for funds that track broad market indices.
Fund flows into small-cap growth stocks can vary with the economic outlook, the funding environment, and overall risk appetite. Because TMFS is a micro-cap fund, investors should check trading liquidity and bid-ask spreads on an order-by-order basis before placing trades.
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF: Strengths and Weaknesses
Active small-cap selection and concentrated management define the fund, but the non-diversified structure and micro-cap size bring volatility that warrants attention.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Alternative and Related Exchange-Traded Funds to the Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
VUG, IWF, and IVW all cover the U.S. growth category, but unlike TMFS they provide index-based exposure with a heavier weighting in large-cap stocks. These funds differ in size and fee structure and can serve as a reference for investors seeking core growth exposure. TMFS can be considered separately for investors who prefer active small-cap selection and concentrated management; additional alternative ETF tickers are limited.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | $88.45 | -0.5% | $228.7B | 0.03% | 0.38% | +14.4% | |
| iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | $123.41 | -0.0% | $126.0B | 0.18% | 0.35% | +9.7% | |
| iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | $140.55 | -0.1% | $77.3B | 0.18% | 0.35% | +21.1% | |
| Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | $35.53 | -0.9% | $63.4B | 0.04% | 0.37% | +15.2% | |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | $121.70 | -0.1% | $54.7B | 0.04% | 0.47% | +21.1% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| StoneX Group Inc | 0.06% | $69.46 | -0.1% | $8.4B | 18.0 | - | |
| StoneX Group Inc | 0.06% | $69.46 | -0.1% | $8.4B | 18.0 | - | |
| GXO Logistics Inc | 0.04% | $48.32 | +2.4% | $5.5B | 42.6 | - | |
| LiveRamp Holdings Inc | 0.05% | $37.75 | -0.0% | $2.3B | 15.6 | - | |
| Hexcel Corp | 0.05% | $91.98 | -0.5% | $7.0B | 46.4 | 0.79% | |
| GXO Logistics Inc | 0.04% | $48.32 | +2.4% | $5.5B | 42.6 | - | |
| Healthequity Inc | 0.04% | $96.07 | -2.7% | $7.9B | 34.7 | - | |
| IPG Photonics Corp | 0.04% | $78.00 | +2.0% | $3.3B | 120.8 | - | |
| Herc Holdings Inc | 0.04% | $140.92 | +1.4% | $4.7B | 96.0 | 2.04% | |
| Herc Holdings Inc | 0.04% | $140.92 | +1.4% | $4.7B | 96.0 | 2.04% |
Investor Checklist for the Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Before buying TMFS, investors should review the concentration of underlying holdings, the results of active management, and the cumulative impact of fees over a long-term holding period. Because the fund is classified as micro-cap, it is also important to verify order types and trading conditions.
| Checkpoint | What to Verify | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Burden | Assess the cumulative impact of fees over a long-term holding period | Comparison needed |
| Concentration | Evaluate how individual holdings affect performance | Caution warranted |
| Trading Conditions | Review bid-ask spreads and order types | Verification needed |
| Distribution Policy | Match cash-flow objectives with the distribution history | No distribution history |
Because of the non-diversified structure and small-cap growth profile, price swings can widen when market risk appetite falls or earnings expectations shift. Investors should also consider the possibility that active management may not deliver the expected results, as well as currency fluctuations versus the Korean won.
TMFS can be a candidate for investors looking to actively select U.S. small-cap growth stocks. However, the micro-cap size, non-diversified structure, and lack of a distribution history must be factored in, and those seeking core growth exposure may be better served by comparing VUG, IWF, and IVW.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of August 15, 2026.