What Is the SPLV ETF? Returns, Fees, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs Explained
The Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV), which holds roughly 100 of the least volatile stocks in the S&P 500, is known for its defensive strength in down markets and its monthly dividend stream. The key point to watch is how its methodology differs from similar low-volatility ETFs such as USMV and FDLO.
What Is the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF?
The fund tracks a low-volatility index built by selecting the roughly 100 S&P 500 constituents with the lowest volatility over the trailing 12 months. Unlike a standard S&P 500 index ETF, it picks stocks by volatility ranking rather than by market capitalization.
It suits conservative investors who value downside protection in falling markets and also want a steady dividend stream.
It is a passive ETF managed by Invesco that tracks an index.
How Does the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked index | S&P 500 Low Volatility Index |
| Management style | Passive (index tracking) |
| Rebalancing frequency | Quarterly |
| Dividend frequency | Monthly |
| Expense ratio | 0.25% |
Based on daily volatility over the prior 12 months, the index selects about 100 S&P 500 stocks in order of lowest volatility and allocates weights using inverse volatility weighting. Each quarter, the holdings and weights are readjusted according to the index committee's criteria.
- Stocks are selected by volatility, not market capitalization
- Relatively high weighting in defensive sectors such as utilities and consumer staples
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $7.5B, and the expense ratio is 0.25% per year.
Compared with USMV, FDLO, and LGLV, which use similar low-volatility strategies, the fund differs in fee level and methodology (S&P index-based versus factor model-based), so its detailed holdings and sector weights set it apart.
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF Performance and Trends
Given the nature of a low-volatility strategy, the fund has tended to rise somewhat less than the broader market in sharp rallies and to fall more gently during market corrections.
When uncertainty over interest rates and the economy comes to the fore, money tends to flow in on demand for defensive asset allocation. Its high utilities weighting also makes it sensitive to changes in the interest rate environment.
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF Pros and Cons
Its strengths are downside protection and stable dividends, while relative underperformance in rising markets and interest rate sensitivity are cited as weaknesses.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Alternative ETFs and Related Products to the Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
USMV, FDLO, and LGLV, shown in the table, are substitutes in the same low-volatility category that use factor model-based methodologies. XMLV is a product that extends exposure to mid-cap stocks, and VFMV is likewise an alternative minimum-volatility strategy. Beyond these, investors who want to compare against a core holding of the whole market can look at a standard S&P 500 index ETF such as VOO, and those who want a greater focus on dividends can consider a dividend growth ETF such as SCHD.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | $102.93 | -0.2% | $24.1B | 0.15% | 1.37% | +10.4% | |
| Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | $74.53 | -0.1% | $1.5B | 0.15% | 1.34% | +13.2% | |
| State Street SPDR US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | $188.23 | +0.2% | $1.2B | 0.12% | 2.06% | +8.9% | |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Low Volatility ETF | $66.05 | +0.1% | $726.5M | 0.25% | 3.02% | +7.2% | |
| Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | $148.14 | -0.6% | $505.4M | 0.13% | 1.55% | +14.8% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FE | Firstenergy Corp | 0.01% | $46.91 | +0.2% | $27.2B | 22.6 | 3.93% |
| SCCO | Southern Copper Corp | 0.01% | $177.53 | -7.4% | $149.9B | 23.6 | 2.46% |
| CNP | Centerpoint Energy Inc | 0.01% | $42.44 | +0.5% | $28.1B | 24.3 | 2.18% |
| Loews Corp | 0.01% | $111.32 | -0.3% | $22.8B | 13.6 | 0.22% | |
| WEC | WEC Energy Group Inc | 0.01% | $116.07 | +1.3% | $37.8B | 21.1 | 3.28% |
| Evergy Inc | 0.01% | $85.91 | +0.6% | $19.8B | 21.8 | 3.22% | |
| AEE | Ameren Corp | 0.01% | $110.54 | +0.3% | $30.6B | 19.5 | 2.73% |
| BRK-B | Berkshire Hathaway Inc | 0.01% | $542.49 | +0.1% | $1.16T | 13.6 | - |
| ATO | Atmos Energy Corp | 0.01% | $172.41 | +0.8% | $29.1B | 20.5 | 2.32% |
| DUK | Duke Energy Corp | 0.01% | $127.39 | +1.2% | $99.3B | 19.1 | 3.42% |
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in SPLV. Although it is a strongly defensive product, it is worth confirming in advance its relative underperformance in rising markets and its sector concentration.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense ratio | Check the cumulative impact over a long holding period | Needs comparison within the category |
| 🛡️ Defensiveness | Compare drawdowns across different down-market phases | Holding up |
| ⚡ Sector weights | Degree of concentration in defensive sectors such as utilities | On the high side |
| 📈 Relative returns | Performance versus the market in rising markets | Needs checking |
Concentration in defensive sectors such as utilities and interest rate sensitivity are the main sources of price swings, and in phases when the market rises strongly, performance may lag the market as a whole.
It is a suitable choice for conservative investors who prioritize downside protection and stable dividends. Those who also want to capture rising-market gains are advised to compare alternatives such as USMV and VOO.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of July 2, 2026.