What Is the RMNY ETF? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF, ticker RMNY, selects New York municipal bonds in pursuit of potentially tax-exempt income. Key factors in assessing its outlook include its dividend and distribution history, interest-rate sensitivity, and credit risk, and investors should also understand how its management approach differs from that of index-tracking products.
What Is the Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF?
The RMNY ETF is an actively managed product that, rather than replicating a specific index, selects New York municipal bonds aimed at generating potentially tax-exempt income. It focuses on finding relative value among individual bonds by reviewing value and credit conditions together.
It is suited to investors who want to understand active bond exposure while weighing New York State after-tax income and municipal credit risk together.
It is an ETF with an active management approach, run by Rockefeller Asset Management.
How Does the Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | Not applicable; active bond selection |
| Management Approach | Active, centered on credit analysis |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Adjusted at the manager's discretion |
| Dividend Frequency | Has a distribution history; irregular frequency |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55% |
| Manager | Rockefeller Asset Management |
Rockefeller Asset Management looks for relative-value opportunities in the New York municipal bond market and uses a bottom-up approach that analyzes the underlying credit conditions of each issuer. As a result, portfolio composition and performance are affected not only by broad market movements but also by individual bond selection and credit judgments.
- Targets income potentially exempt from New York State taxes
- Value-driven, bottom-up credit analysis
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $30.9M, and the total expense ratio is 0.55% per year.
Unlike index-tracking municipal bond products, this ETF reflects the manager's judgment directly in its portfolio construction, so investors should review not only the fee but also the credit selection process and distribution policy.
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF Performance and Trends
The return profile of the RMNY ETF is shaped by municipal bond yields, maturity structure, credit spreads, and the conditions of individual issuers. Short-term volatility can occur as interest-rate changes are reflected in bond prices, and the results of active selection can also affect relative performance.
Demand for New York municipal bonds can vary with the interest of investors who prioritize after-tax income, as well as with the interest-rate environment and shifts in risk appetite. Rather than judging the quality of a product by fund flows alone, it is more reasonable to also examine trading conditions, the credit characteristics of the bonds held, and the variability of distribution history.
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF Pros and Cons
Potentially tax-exempt income and credit selection are its strengths, but investors must also accept the risks of interest rates, issuer credit conditions, and a non-diversified structure.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF Alternative ETFs and Related Products
In the table, the VTEB ETF offers nationwide tax-exempt municipal bond exposure, and the MUB ETF offers broad access to US municipal bonds, making both useful comparison candidates. The JMUB ETF can be considered when comparing municipal income products, and the CGMU ETF when examining management approach and income objectives. The CMF ETF focuses on California municipal bonds, so it can be used to check differences in regional exposure against the RMNY ETF, which is centered on New York State. Additional comparison product data is limited to the input list.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares National Muni Bond ETF | $104.82 | +0.3% | $54.9B | 0.05% | 3.27% | -2.5% | |
| Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | $49.19 | +0.2% | $53.9B | 0.03% | 3.46% | -2.6% | |
| JPMorgan Municipal ETF | $49.39 | +0.2% | $9.2B | 0.18% | 3.79% | -2.8% | |
| Capital Group Municipal Income ETF | $26.96 | +0.1% | $7.7B | 0.27% | 3.39% | -1.9% | |
| iShares California Muni Bond ETF | $56.16 | +0.2% | $5.5B | 0.08% | 3.03% | -2.5% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York Times Co | 0.26% | $72.70 | +0.2% | $11.6B | 29.1 | 1.24% |
Rockefeller New York Municipal Bond ETF Investor Checkpoints
When reviewing the RMNY ETF, investors should not look only at the goal of potentially tax-exempt income, but also check the characteristics of active management, the credit conditions of municipal issuers, and interest-rate sensitivity. Cash-flow expectations and trading conditions in particular should be checked separately.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| After-Tax Income | Confirm what potentially tax-exempt income means given your residence and tax situation | Personal circumstances must be confirmed |
| Credit Composition | Review possible concentration in issuers and sectors, and credit characteristics | Holdings must be confirmed |
| Interest-Rate Risk | Check maturity structure and price sensitivity to interest-rate changes | Subject to change |
| Distribution History | Reflect the distribution history and irregular frequency in cash-flow planning | Frequency cannot be assumed |
Municipal bonds can change in value depending on interest rates and issuer credit conditions, and a non-diversified structure can magnify the impact that adverse developments in a particular sector have on the entire product. Tax-related effects can also differ depending on an investor's residence and tax conditions, so separate verification is necessary.
The RMNY ETF is an approach that pursues potentially tax-exempt income through New York municipal bonds while making use of active credit selection. It has a distribution history, but the frequency is irregular, and when comparing it with index-based products, investors should look not only at the fee but also at differences in regional exposure, management judgment, and credit risk.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of August 17, 2026.