What Is the QYLD ETF? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings and Alternative ETFs
The Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) pursues monthly income from premiums earned by selling call options on the index it holds. Differences in expense ratio, strategy and upside participation versus income-oriented alternatives such as JEPQ and XYLD are the key selection criteria.
SubscribeWhat Is the Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF?
The fund tracks a covered call strategy that holds the Nasdaq 100 Index while selling call options on the same index. It uses option premiums as the source of income and aims to pay distributions every month, giving up part of the index's upside in the process.
It suits income-seeking investors who prioritize a steady monthly income stream over the index's large capital gains.
It is a passively managed ETF (index-tracking) operated by Global X.
How Does the Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | Nasdaq 100-based buy-write index |
| Management Style | Covered call (hold the index + sell call options) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Monthly option rollover |
| Distribution Frequency | Monthly dividends |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60% |
The fund uses a buy-write strategy: it holds Nasdaq 100 stocks and then sells call options on that index to collect premiums. The premiums collected fund the monthly distributions and generate income, but when the index rises sharply, upside participation is capped at the strike price of the call options sold.
- Aims for monthly income based on option premiums
- A volatility-dampening structure that gives up part of the index's upside
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $8.4B, and the total expense ratio is 0.60% per year.
Compared with similar income-oriented alternatives such as JEPQ and XYLD, the strategy and expense ratio differ, so it is important to weigh the income profile and costs together.
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF Performance and Trends
1-Year Price Performance
Dividend & Yield
52-Week Price RangeGiven the nature of the covered call structure, capital gains tend to lag the index in strong rallies, while premium income tends to stand out in sideways or volatile periods. Total returns vary widely depending on the market regime.
Demand for high-dividend and monthly-dividend income drives fund flows, and the appeal of income products as a whole can shift with the interest rate environment and the level of market volatility. Interest tends to build when the preference for income rises.
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF Pros and Cons
Its strength is the pursuit of steady monthly dividend income, while limited upside participation in bull markets and a somewhat high expense ratio are cited as drawbacks.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF Alternative and Related ETFs
Income-oriented alternatives shown in the table include JEPQ and GPIQ, actively managed Nasdaq-based income ETFs; JEPI and GPIX, S&P 500-based income ETFs; and XYLD, an S&P 500 covered call ETF from the same issuer. They differ in how they use options and in expense ratios. Investors can also consider RYLD, a Russell 2000-based covered call ETF from the same issuer, and QQQM, which simply tracks the Nasdaq 100 at a lower expense ratio.
Peer Comparison ETFs| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 JEPI | JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF | $57.56 | -0.6% | $46.5B | 0.35% | 7.93% | +1.1% |
 JEPQ | JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | $57.58 | -3.0% | $43.7B | 0.35% | 11.96% | -2.3% |
 GPIQ | Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | $54.29 | -3.2% | $6.6B | 0.29% | 10.62% | +0.7% |
 GPIX | Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | $55.14 | -1.6% | $6.5B | 0.29% | 8.32% | +4.2% |
 XYLD | Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | $41.10 | -1.1% | $3.4B | 0.60% | 10.31% | +3.2% |
Top Holdings| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 0.17% | $204.64 | -4.2% | $4.93T | 25.9 | 0.38% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 0.15% | $344.63 | -1.2% | $5.03T | 39.5 | 0.32% |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 0.11% | $521.91 | -1.6% | $3.88T | 27.3 | 0.74% |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 0.10% | $240.35 | -1.4% | $2.59T | 19.4 | - |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 0.04% | $884.74 | -5.3% | $1.00T | 11.9 | 0.08% |
| GOOGL | Alphabet Inc | 0.04% | $279.84 | -1.4% | $3.41T | 14.6 | 0.31% |
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in QYLD. The appeal of monthly dividend income is clear, but limited upside participation in bull markets, the expense burden, and distribution variability that depends on option premiums are items to confirm in advance.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the impact of cumulative costs over a long holding period | Annual fee applies |
| 💰 Distribution Nature | Understand the source of monthly dividends and distribution variability | May vary |
| 📉 Upside Participation | Recognize the structure that limits gains in bull markets | Always applies |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Impact on returns when converted to Korean won | No currency hedge |
In bull markets, capital gains may lag the index, and distributions fluctuate with the level of option premiums. Note that income does not guarantee principal protection or downside defense.
It is a fitting choice for investors who put steady monthly income ahead of the index's capital gains. If upside participation matters more, a simple tracking product such as QQQM may be better, while this ETF is more suitable when the income profile comes first.
SubscribeDisclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 21, 2026.
Today's 5 AI picks, all free