What Is the QUAL ETF? Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF (QUAL) tracks high-quality stocks with high ROE, stable earnings, and low debt. Differences in fees, dividends, and issuer versus peer quality factor ETFs such as SPHQ and JQUA are the key selection criteria.
What Is the iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF?
This is a factor ETF that tracks the MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index. It selects and weights large- and mid-cap US companies with high return on equity, low earnings volatility, and low debt burdens, while keeping sector weights neutral to the parent index.
It suits long-term investors who want to diversify across US large caps while adding a quality tilt toward companies with strong financial health.
It is a passive (index-tracking) ETF managed by BlackRock (iShares).
How Does the iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | MSCI USA Sector Neutral Quality Index |
| Management Style | Passive (index-tracking) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Semiannual |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Issuer | BlackRock (iShares) |
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% |
The index scores stocks on three quality metrics, namely high return on equity, stable earnings growth, and low financial leverage, and gives higher weights to high-quality companies. Sector weights are kept neutral to the parent index to reduce concentration in specific industries and pursue a purer quality factor effect, and rebalancing is reflected semiannually according to the index rules.
- Selection of high-quality stocks based on financial health
- Sector-neutral approach that eases industry concentration
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $48.6B, and the expense ratio is 0.15% per year.
Compared with SPHQ and JQUA in the same quality factor category, the issuer and the composition of the tracked index differ, which leads to differences in fees and in how holdings are selected.
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF Performance and Trends
Because of its heavy weighting in high-quality stocks, the fund tends to move similarly to the broader market, but in volatile periods it has tended to hold up relatively well thanks to a preference for financially sound companies. Short-term performance is also affected by interest rates and earnings seasons.
Fund flows have been steady, driven by demand for factor investing and its role as a core complement, and in periods of rising risk aversion, money moving toward financially sound companies can become especially visible. It belongs to the large-size tier of the broad-market category.
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF Pros and Cons
Its strengths are diversification across high-quality stocks based on financial health and a reasonable fee level, while a drawback is that, depending on the market phase, its differentiation from the broader market can narrow.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF Alternative and Related ETFs
SPHQ, JQUA, and QGRW shown in the table are comparison candidates in the same quality factor family, with differences in tracked index, issuer, and fee structure. Meanwhile, from the same iShares factor series, MTUM, which focuses on momentum, and USMV, which lowers volatility, are other factor choices, and if you want broad core exposure at a lower fee without a factor tilt, you can also consider VOO.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | $82.97 | -2.2% | $19.0B | 0.15% | 1.05% | +11.9% | |
| WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund | $98.46 | -0.9% | $17.1B | 0.28% | 1.24% | +10.3% | |
| JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | $75.52 | -1.5% | $9.7B | 0.12% | 1.05% | +20.4% | |
| WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | $64.56 | -2.8% | $3.2B | 0.28% | 0.08% | +8.1% | |
| Northern Trust Quality Dividend ETF | $90.47 | -1.6% | $2.2B | 0.39% | 1.51% | +12.3% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 0.12% | $521.91 | -1.6% | $3.88T | 27.3 | 0.74% |
| AAPL | Apple Inc | 0.13% | $344.63 | -1.2% | $5.03T | 39.5 | 0.32% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 0.12% | $204.64 | -4.2% | $4.93T | 25.9 | 0.38% |
| TJX | TJX Companies Inc | 0.04% | $140.31 | -0.8% | $154.3B | 25.9 | 1.35% |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 0.04% | $614.99 | -1.5% | $1.57T | 21.0 | 0.3% |
| LLY | Lilly(Eli) & Co | 0.04% | $1417.54 | +3.2% | $1.33T | 46.6 | 0.48% |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 0.03% | $239.11 | -6.0% | $298.7B | 35.6 | 0.55% |
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF Investor Checkpoints
These are points to review before investing in QUAL. It is useful as a core complement, but it is best to check the characteristics of the quality factor, market correlation, fee costs, and currency exposure before buying.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the cumulative cost impact over a long holding period | On the low side |
| 📊 Quality Factor | Check the selection criteria and differentiation from the parent index | Maintained |
| 🏢 Top Holdings Concentration | Check the trend in the weights of top holdings such as Big Tech | Large-cap weighting is high |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Check the impact on returns converted to Korean won | No currency hedge applied |
Large-cap weighting and exchange-rate fluctuations are the main drivers of short-term volatility, and in phases when the quality factor lags the market, relative performance can fall behind. During market crashes, even a fund centered on high-quality stocks can suffer sizable short-term losses.
It is a core complement suited to long-term investors who want to add a quality tilt based on financial health to US large caps. If pure core exposure and low cost are the priority, consider VOO, and if you want diversification across other factors, MTUM and USMV are also worth considering.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 21, 2026.