QLTI ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) is an actively managed ETF that invests in high-quality developed-market stocks outside the US, and its core is GMO's quality selection strategy. Compared with the passive factor ETFs IQLT and IDHQ, the key selection criteria are the difference in fees, dividends, and management approach.
What Is the GMO International Quality ETF?
It is an actively managed ETF that concentrates on high-quality companies in developed markets outside the US. It selects stocks based on qualitative strength, such as high return on equity and stable cash flow.
It suits long-term investors who want to diversify into high-quality developed-market stocks outside the US while preferring the stock selection of active management.
It is an ETF run by GMO using an active management approach.
How Does the GMO International Quality ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | Benchmark comparison (active management) |
| Management Style | Active (stock selection) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | At the managers' discretion |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Issuer | GMO |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60% |
Using GMO's proprietary quality analysis model, the fund selects companies with high profitability and financial stability in developed markets outside the US. Rather than simply tracking an index, it adjusts weightings based on the managers' judgment, following the philosophy that qualitative superiority leads to long-term performance.
- Applies GMO's proprietary quality selection model
- Focuses on developed markets outside the US
GMO International Quality ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $285.2M, and the total expense ratio is 0.60% per year.
Compared with IQLT, a factor-based passive ETF, it is an active structure with greater manager discretion, and its fee burden is similar to the category average.
GMO International Quality ETF Performance and Trends
The performance of international quality stocks has been influenced by exchange rates and the global economic cycle relative to the US, and short-term swings tend to depend on interest rates and currency trends in developed markets. Because of its active selection approach, its performance may diverge from the benchmark.
Demand for diversification outside the US and a preference for quality stocks underpin fund flows, and during periods of dollar strength, inflows into international equity ETFs as a whole sometimes slow. Given the nature of the active category, fund flows may be volatile depending on management performance.
GMO International Quality ETF Pros and Cons
GMO's proven quality selection capability and international diversification are its strengths, while the fee burden of the active structure and currency exposure are its drawbacks.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Alternative ETFs and Related Products to the GMO International Quality ETF
IQLT and IDHQ in the table are passive factor ETFs in the same international quality category, characterized by lower fees, while IHDG, IQDF, and IQDG are variations focused on quality dividend growth. If you want broad exposure to developed markets outside the US as a whole, you can also consider the broad developed-market core ETFs EFA and VEA, which differ in character because they track the overall market without quality selection.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | $49.87 | -0.6% | $13.7B | 0.30% | 2.4% | +10.9% | |
| WisdomTree International Hedged Quality Dividend Growth Fund | $51.33 | -0.8% | $2.1B | 0.58% | 1.81% | +8.8% | |
| Invesco S&P International Developed Quality ETF | $43.66 | -0.9% | $1.2B | 0.29% | 1.94% | +25.9% | |
| Northern Trust International Quality Dividend ETF | $33.51 | +0.0% | $1.1B | 0.47% | 3.55% | +15.8% | |
| WisdomTree International Quality Dividend Growth Fund | $41.80 | -0.8% | $681.6M | 0.42% | 2.42% | +3.9% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSM | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ADR | 0.11% | $418.51 | +1.5% | $2.17T | 26.9 | 0.99% |
| NVS | Novartis AG ADR | 0.08% | $151.12 | -3.3% | $276.6B | 22.8 | 2.88% |
| ASML | ASML Holding NV | 0.04% | $1571.80 | +0.7% | $605.8B | 38.7 | 0.66% |
| SAP | Sap SE ADR | 0.08% | $238.14 | -1.0% | $268.9B | 29.1 | 1.25% |
| HLN | Haleon plc ADR | 0.04% | $10.27 | -1.0% | $45.2B | 21.1 | 2.1% |
| UL | Unilever plc ADR | 0.04% | $66.23 | -1.1% | $142.7B | 22.1 | 3.26% |
GMO International Quality ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in QLTI. As an actively managed ETF, it is important to thoroughly check its fees and management approach, as well as the regional exposure and currency effects that come with its focus on developed markets outside the US.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the fee level resulting from active management | Category average level |
| 🌍 Regional Exposure | Check the weighting of developed markets outside the US | International focus |
| 💱 Currency | Impact of converting dollars and local currencies | Unhedged |
| 📊 Management Style | Check the performance dispersion of active selection | Managers' discretion |
The fee burden from active management and performance dispersion relative to the benchmark are the main risk factors. Because it concentrates on markets outside the US, volatility can increase during periods of currency swings and global economic slowdown.
It is a suitable choice for long-term investors who want to invest actively in high-quality developed-market stocks outside the US. If you prefer low-fee passive exposure, factor ETFs such as IQLT and IDHQ are a better fit, and if you trust the managers' quality selection, QLTI is the better fit.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 11, 2026.