USSTOCK.TODAY
Market Closed
Log in Sign up
ETF Profiles

What Is the MPLY ETF? Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs Explained

Updated August 18, 2026 · First published August 18, 2026

The MPLY ETF, a monopoly-themed ETF, is an actively managed product that selects companies showing market dominance, high barriers to entry, and pricing power. It places more weight on security selection than on tracking a specific index, so investors should also check its lack of distribution history and its thematic concentration risk.

Briefs · earnings · signals, first Subscribe
🏷️

What Is the Monopoly ETF?

The MPLY ETF is an active ETF that selects companies by assessing traits that can sustain a competitive advantage, such as brand strength, regulatory exclusivity, industry concentration, and network effects. Unlike products that track a single index, it reflects the manager's judgment in portfolio construction.

It suits long-term investors who are interested in the market dominance theme and can tolerate the volatility of individual company selection and exposure to specific growth stocks.

It is an ETF run with an active (actively managed) approach by Strategy Shares.

💰

How Does the Monopoly ETF Invest?

ItemDetails
Tracking indexNot applicable, active selection
Management styleActive
Rebalancing frequencyAdjusted at the manager's discretion
Distribution frequencyNo distribution history
Total expense ratio0.79%
ManagerStrategy Shares

The product examines companies mainly through qualitative factors related to market dominance, including limited competition, high barriers to entry, pricing power, intellectual property protection, and supply chain control. The manager also evaluates financial soundness and growth potential, and may adjust portfolio weights depending on market conditions and its view of individual securities. Official holdings include NVDA, GOOG, AAPL, MSFT, and AMZN, so the fund may also be affected by growth stocks and large technology companies.

  • Evaluates market dominance and competitive structure together
  • Reflects the manager's judgment rather than mechanically tracking an index
📐

Monopoly ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)

Assets under management (AUM) stand at $17.7M, and the total expense ratio is 0.79% per year.

Given its thematic active structure, it is appropriate to review the MPLY ETF's trading liquidity, bid-ask spread, and fee burden alongside similar products.

📈

Monopoly ETF Performance and Trends

1-Year Price Performance
Dividend & Yield
1Y Return +3.9%
Next Ex-Dividend Date 12/29/2025
52-Week Price Range
$32
Low $27 High $34
vs. low +19.98% vs. high -6.56%

The performance of the MPLY ETF can be affected by investor preference for companies with strong market dominance, shifts in growth stock valuations, and the interest rate and earnings environment. Interest may grow when the theme's appeal is rising, but if corrections in a few core holdings continue, return volatility may also increase.

Fund flows in thematic active ETFs can be more sensitive to confidence in the investment philosophy and holdings than flows in broad market exposure products. Even if market dominance remains a valid criterion, inflows and outflows can vary with industry regulation, changes in the competitive landscape, and shifts in growth stock preference, so investors need to keep monitoring the trend.

⚔️

Monopoly ETF Strengths and Weaknesses

Its clear application of the market dominance theme is a strength, but exposure to a small number of core holdings and to specific growth industries can raise volatility.

💪 Key Strengths

Competitive advantage selection
It looks at factors such as pricing power and barriers to entry to assess the sustainability of long-term profitability.
Active judgment
It does not rely solely on index inclusion rules, and reflects each company's competitive structure in portfolio construction.
Clear theme
It presents a consistent criterion of market dominance, making the product's approach easy for investors to understand.

⚠️ Points to Watch

Thematic concentration risk
If weights are skewed toward companies that meet the market dominance criteria, the fund can be heavily affected by sector and growth stock swings.
Management judgment risk
If company selection and weight adjustments fall short of expectations, performance may lag broad market indexes.
Regulatory and competitive changes
Antitrust investigations, changes in the regulatory environment, and the emergence of new competitors can weaken a company's competitive advantage.
🔄

Monopoly ETF Alternatives and Related Products

The DYNF ETF in the table is an active rotation product that shows a relatively low fee structure and large assets under management among the comparison group. The THRO ETF focuses on a thematic rotation strategy, and the ARKK ETF on selecting innovative growth stocks. The JMEE ETF and the PSC ETF are characterized by small and mid-cap stock selection and small-cap market exposure, respectively, so their investment logic differs from the MPLY ETF's market dominance theme. Therefore, when considering the MPLY ETF, it is appropriate to compare thematic concentration and the possibility of overlapping holdings.

Peer Comparison ETFs
TickerNamePriceChangeAUMTotal Expense RatioDividend Yield1Y
DYNFDYNFiShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF$67.12+0.5%$41.6B0.26%0.84%+9.9%
THROTHROiShares U.S. Thematic Rotation Active ETF$42.78+0.3%$7.3B0.57%0.3%+10.2%
ARKKARKKARK Innovation ETF$80.32+1.7%$6.0B0.75%--8.9%
JMEEJMEEJPMorgan Small & Mid Cap Enhanced Equity ETF$75.34+0.1%$3.0B0.24%0.96%+19.0%
PSCPSCPrincipal U.S. Small-Cap ETF$68.13+0.1%$2.7B0.38%0.59%+20.6%
Top Holdings
TickerNameWeightPriceChangeMarket CapP/EDividend Yield
GOOGLAlphabet Inc0.20%$279.89+0.3%$3.42T14.60.31%
NVDANVIDIA Corp0.20%$206.65+2.3%$4.98T26.10.38%
AAPLApple Inc0.18%$331.70-2.0%$4.84T37.00.35%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp0.15%$520.80+2.7%$3.87T27.20.74%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc0.13%$250.80+2.1%$2.71T20.3-
✅

Monopoly ETF Investor Checkpoints

When considering the MPLY ETF, investors should look not only at the merits of the market dominance theme itself but also at portfolio concentration, the discretion of active management, and the trading environment. Because there is no distribution history, it is necessary to check whether your expectations for long-term capital growth and your risk tolerance fit the product, rather than looking to it for cash flow.

CheckpointWhat to CheckCurrent Status
Thematic concentrationCheck whether core holdings and industry exposure overlap with your existing portfolioNeeds checking
Management discretionReview how company selection criteria and weight adjustments are affected by market conditionsReflects manager's judgment
Distribution policyConsider whether it suits a goal focused on capital growth rather than cash flowNo distribution history
Trading environmentCheck liquidity and the bid-ask spread before placing an orderNeeds checking

Market dominance is not permanently guaranteed, and regulatory changes, technological changes, and the emergence of new competition can affect a company's pricing power and profitability. In addition, thematic active ETFs can move differently from broad market ETFs depending on the results of security selection and weight adjustments, and investors who measure returns in Korean won should also factor in exchange rate fluctuations.

The MPLY ETF is an active ETF that focuses on market dominance and the sustainability of competitive advantage. It aims for long-term capital growth rather than distributions, and may be a candidate for investors who can accept the technology stock character of its holdings and its thematic concentration. Before investing, it is advisable to check the management approach, fees, liquidity, and any overlap with your existing holdings.

Briefs · earnings · signals, first Subscribe

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.

This article reflects information as of August 18, 2026.

Today's 5 AI picks, all free
Nothing hidden: past picks and how they did against the S&P 500.
See today's picks →