MFVL ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Fees, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) is a passive product that offers access to US stocks through rules-based value factors. Investors can review its lack of a distribution history and the potential for concentration in a few holdings, and compare trends in value stocks and fee levels.
What Is the Motley Fool Value Factor ETF?
The MFVL ETF is a passive product designed to track Motley Fool's rules-based value index. It gives exposure to a value-oriented group of US stocks by combining valuation, profitability, and shareholder return criteria.
It may suit investors who want exposure to US value stocks and prefer to understand a composite, rules-based selection method rather than relying on a single value metric.
It is an ETF managed passively (index tracking) by Motley Fool Asset Management.
How Does the Motley Fool Value Factor ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked index | Motley Fool's rules-based value index |
| Management style | Passive index tracking |
| Rebalancing frequency | Periodic adjustments according to the index methodology |
| Distribution frequency | No distribution history |
| Total expense ratio | 0.50% |
| Manager | Motley Fool Asset Management |
Rather than depending on a single value metric, this product follows a rules-based index that reflects valuation, profitability, and shareholder return factors together. The structure is intended to screen out stocks that look undervalued but have weak business conditions, and the portfolio composition is adjusted according to the index rules.
- Reflects composite value factors
- Rules-based design that considers profitability and shareholder return criteria together
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $7.7M, and the total expense ratio is 0.50% per year.
Quoted prices and execution conditions at the time of trading can affect actual trading results, so it is worth checking trading volume and the bid-ask spread separately.
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF Performance and Trends
The performance of value factors can vary with interest rates, economic expectations, and differences in earnings across sectors. Because the MFVL ETF follows a rules-based selection structure, it may stand out in phases when valuation and profitability conditions matter more, but it could also lag in environments where investors strongly favor growth stocks.
Fund size and trading conditions can change over time, so it is worth checking fund flows and execution conditions together. In particular, when compared with more liquid peer value ETFs, differences in bid-ask spreads, ease of trading, and fee burden can influence the selection process.
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF Strengths and Weaknesses
Combining composite value factors with profitability criteria is a strength, but the fee burden and the volatility that comes with a non-diversified structure are points to examine.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF Alternative ETFs and Related Products
In the comparison table, the VTV ETF focuses on broad value stocks, the IWD ETF reflects a wide range of large-cap value stocks, and the IVE ETF follows a large-cap value style. The VBR ETF leans toward small-cap value stocks, while the SPYV ETF leans toward large-cap value stocks, so their characteristics may differ. When reviewing the holdings of the MFVL ETF, it is also worth looking at the sectors and individual price movements of stocks such as FDX, CVS, CVX, AMGN, and WMT.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | $226.55 | +0.7% | $193.0B | 0.03% | 1.84% | +21.4% | |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | $259.05 | +0.3% | $84.5B | 0.18% | 1.36% | +26.8% | |
| iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | $239.47 | +0.6% | $50.4B | 0.18% | 1.51% | +15.1% | |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | $64.13 | +0.6% | $38.4B | 0.04% | 1.65% | +15.1% | |
| Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | $241.54 | +0.9% | $36.4B | 0.05% | 1.83% | +16.3% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDX | Fedex Corp | 0.06% | $303.92 | +1.9% | $71.9B | 16.4 | 1.57% |
| CVS | CVS Health Corp | 0.06% | $94.48 | +1.1% | $120.8B | 24.9 | 2.89% |
| CVX | Chevron Corp | 0.06% | $226.68 | -0.0% | $447.9B | 21.7 | 3.15% |
| AMGN | AMGEN Inc | 0.05% | $447.28 | +2.0% | $241.8B | 27.8 | 2.26% |
| WMT | Walmart Inc | 0.05% | $121.12 | +2.8% | $960.9B | 43.9 | 0.82% |
| HCA | HCA Healthcare Inc | 0.05% | $467.31 | +1.7% | $101.2B | 15.7 | 0.6% |
| TMUS | T-Mobile US Inc | 0.05% | $158.79 | +3.3% | $170.3B | 16.6 | 2.61% |
| DIS | Walt Disney Co | 0.05% | $113.13 | +1.2% | $195.3B | 23.3 | 1.22% |
| BMY | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 0.05% | $63.00 | +3.1% | $128.7B | 13.9 | 4.03% |
| ADBE | Adobe Inc | 0.05% | $270.55 | +6.1% | $105.3B | 15.1 | - |
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF Investor Checkpoints
When considering the Motley Fool Value Factor ETF, investors should look beyond simple exposure to value stocks and check the index's selection method, fee burden, distribution history, and trading conditions together. In particular, it is necessary to examine in which market environments a rules-based index may be relatively strong or weak.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Fee burden | Cost difference compared with peer value ETFs | Comparison needed |
| Distribution history | Whether there is a history of cash distributions | No distribution history |
| Holding concentration | Potential impact of individual holdings | Concentration check needed |
| Trading environment | Bid-ask spread and execution conditions | Regular checks needed |
Rules-based value strategies can lag in relative terms when the market favors growth stocks or when the explanatory power of value metrics weakens. A non-diversified structure, movements in individual holdings, and changes in trading conditions can together affect short-term performance and trading results.
For investors who want rules-based access to US value stocks, it is important to compare the composition of the selection criteria and the cost burden together. After understanding the lack of a distribution history, the potential for concentration, and trading conditions, investors should judge whether the product fits their own investment goals and risk tolerance.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of August 20, 2026.