What Is the MAYZ ETF? A Complete Guide to Returns, Fees, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The MAYZ ETF, TrueShares' Structured Outcome May ETF, uses options on a US large-cap price index to seek both a cushion against declines and participation in gains. The key points to review, alongside the market outlook, are the option structure, the conditions of the outcome period, and how results differ for investors who trade mid-period.
What Is the TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF?
The MAYZ ETF is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that uses an options strategy linked to the movements of a US large-cap price index. It seeks both a buffer structure that absorbs part of the index's declines and participation in its gains, but actual results depend on the start of the outcome period and the path the market takes.
It suits investors who want to stay exposed to the stock market while softening the impact of downturns, and who can hold through the outcome period.
It is an ETF run with an active management approach by TrueShares.
How Does the TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Fund type | Exchange-traded fund |
| Tracked index | US large-cap price index |
| Management style | Active options strategy |
| Issuer | TrueShares |
| Rebalancing cycle | Option adjustments aligned with the set outcome period |
| Distribution frequency | Once a year |
| Total expense ratio | 0.79% |
The fund buys and sells options linked to a US large-cap price index in pursuit of a structured outcome. It aims for a certain range of buffer during declines while leaving room to participate in gains. However, this structure does not guarantee principal, and entering or exiting mid-period can produce results that differ from the expected buffer effect.
- An option structure designed to cushion declines while participating in gains
- A management approach that handles conditions on the basis of a defined outcome period
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) are $33.5M, and the total expense ratio is 0.79% per year.
Option contract prices and market liquidity can change the results an investor actually experiences, depending on the holding period. To compare the characteristics of a structured outcome product, look not only at fees but also at the entry point, the remaining outcome period, and the buffer conditions.
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF Performance and Trends
The trajectory of a structured outcome product is shaped not only by the direction of the underlying stock index but also by option prices, volatility expectations, and where the fund sits within its outcome period. In rising markets the participation structure becomes important, while in falling markets the remaining buffer can be the key variable in the results investors experience.
Interest in buffer products can grow when demand rises for staying invested in stocks while lowering downside risk. However, buying during an outcome period can lead to conditions that differ from the initial settings, so it is necessary to check the current conditions in the fund's disclosure materials.
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF Pros and Cons
The structure that cushions declines and leaves room to participate in gains is an advantage, but investors who do not understand the outcome period and option conditions may see results that differ from their expectations.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF Alternative ETFs and Related Products
Among the products shown in the table, the BUFR ETF combines buffer structures in stages, and the SFLR ETF takes an approach that manages a loss floor. The BUFD ETF and the BUFQ ETF are comparison candidates for those considering a deeper buffer and Nasdaq-centered exposure, respectively, and the FJAN ETF is a structured outcome product whose outcome period begins in a different month. These products differ in management approach, underlying index, buffer range, and fee burden, so rather than comparing them one to one, investors should check the conditions of each outcome period together.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT Vest Laddered Buffer ETF | $37.40 | -1.1% | $11.0B | 0.95% | - | +10.9% | |
| Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF | $38.75 | -1.8% | $2.3B | 0.89% | 0.25% | +5.7% | |
| FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | $30.37 | -0.8% | $2.2B | 0.95% | - | +9.1% | |
| FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | $39.24 | -2.0% | $1.7B | 1.00% | - | +11.1% | |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - January | $56.42 | -1.1% | $1.5B | 0.85% | - | +11.3% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States Antimony Corp | 0.94% | $2.98 | -5.7% | $446.0M | - | - | |
| United States Lime & Minerals Inc | 0.86% | $111.61 | -2.0% | $3.2B | 23.9 | 0.22% | |
| State Street My2031 Municipal Bond ETF | 0.00% | $24.67 | +0.1% | $0.0M | - | 2.61% |
TrueShares Structured Outcome May ETF Investor Checkpoints
When evaluating the MAYZ ETF, do not look only at index exposure, but also review the option buffer structure and the conditions of the current outcome period. In particular, mid-period purchases and early sales can lead to results different from those of initial investors, so checking the disclosure materials is necessary.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | Check the total expense ratio together with trading costs | Check disclosure materials |
| Buffer conditions | Review the start of the outcome period and the remaining conditions | Varies by outcome period |
| Underlying index exposure | Review the volatility risk of the US large-cap price index | Heavily affected by the stock market |
| Trade timing | Check differences from mid-period purchases and early sales | Varies by holding timing |
The buffer structure of the MAYZ ETF presupposes a defined outcome period and set option conditions. If the market falls sharply, losses can continue beyond the buffer range, and trading during the outcome period can weaken the protective characteristics investors expect. Exchange rate movements and the gap between the ETF's market price and its net asset value should also be considered.
The MAYZ ETF is a product that investors can consider if they want to participate in the US large-cap market while partly reducing the impact of declines. However, rather than approaching it like a simple index product, it is more appropriate to understand the current outcome period, buffer conditions, and the effect of mid-period trading, and then judge whether it fits one's own holding plan.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of August 17, 2026.