GARY ETF: What Is It? — Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Alpha Architect Growth ETF (GARY) is an actively managed growth ETF in which the portfolio team selectively invests in companies with high growth potential. Key selection criteria include the fee and dividend differences versus low-expense passive growth ETFs that track indices such as VUG, SCHG, and IWF, along with the outlook for fund performance.
What Is the Alpha Architect Growth ETF?
It is an actively managed growth ETF that pursues long-term capital appreciation by actively investing in stocks of companies with strong growth prospects. The management team selects holdings and adjusts weightings using a combination of fundamental and quantitative metrics.
It is well suited for investors seeking exposure to growth stocks through active, manager-driven stock selection, going beyond passive index tracking.
It is an actively managed ETF run by Alpha Architect.
How does the Alpha Architect Growth ETF invest?| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Benchmark Index | No benchmark (actively managed) |
| Management Style | Active (manager-driven selection) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | At the manager's discretion |
| Dividend Schedule | Irregular |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77% |
The management team selects companies it deems to have strong growth potential by synthesizing multiple fundamental and market indicators, including consistent trends in revenue and earnings growth. Rather than simply replicating an index, the fund actively adjusts holdings and weightings, with a structure that combines primarily U.S. technology and growth stocks along with select foreign holdings and cash.
- Active selection combining fundamentals and quantitative analysis
- Mixed exposure to U.S. and international growth stocks
Alpha Architect Growth ETF Size and Costs (AUM & Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $298.1M, with a total expense ratio of 0.77% annually.
Expense ratios tend to be higher than those of passive growth ETFs, but the structure is designed to pursue outperformance through active, manager-driven selection.
Alpha Architect Growth ETF Performance and Flows
Given its growth-stock orientation, volatility tends to be elevated, shaped by the market's risk appetite, the interest-rate environment, and the earnings trajectory of technology stocks. Because the fund is actively managed, performance depends heavily on the management team's stock-picking ability, and trends can diverge across market regimes.
Actively managed growth ETFs typically have a smaller asset base than passive core ETFs, and flows tend to be sensitive to the market's appetite for growth names. The trajectory of fund performance serves as the primary driver of capital flows.
Alpha Architect Growth ETF Strengths and Weaknesses
Exposure to growth stocks through active selection is a strength, but higher fees relative to passive products and the risks inherent to active management are drawbacks.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Alpha Architect Growth ETF Alternatives and Related Products
The five tickers shown in the table — VUG, IWF, IVW, SCHG, and SPYG — are all low-expense passive ETFs tracking large-cap growth indices. Unlike this fund's active approach, they simply replicate their benchmark and carry lower fees. For additional comparison within the same growth category, consider QQQ, which tracks the Nasdaq 100, QQQM, which offers an even lower expense ratio, and XLK for investors looking to concentrate on the technology sector.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Morningstar Growth ETF | $87.68 | -0.5% | $226.8B | 0.03% | 0.39% | +12.6% | |
| iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | $122.46 | -0.5% | $125.6B | 0.18% | 0.35% | +8.1% | |
| iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF | $139.33 | -0.3% | $76.9B | 0.18% | 0.36% | +18.9% | |
| Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | $35.01 | -0.7% | $62.4B | 0.04% | 0.38% | +12.6% | |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | $120.66 | -0.4% | $54.4B | 0.04% | 0.48% | +18.9% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.07% | $521.09 | +3.0% | $850.7B | 133.7 | - |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 0.05% | $223.79 | -0.9% | $5.39T | 28.3 | 0.33% |
| ASML | ASML Holding NV | 0.05% | $1729.52 | -2.0% | $666.6B | 53.8 | 0.61% |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 0.05% | $468.85 | -0.8% | $372.1B | 40.4 | 0.41% |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 0.04% | $315.84 | -1.4% | $395.2B | 54.8 | 0.38% |
| KLAC | KLA Corp | 0.04% | $182.91 | -3.2% | $239.0B | 49.9 | 0.51% |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 0.04% | $491.80 | -0.4% | $3.65T | 27.4 | 0.79% |
| TSM | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing ADR | 0.04% | $435.36 | -0.8% | $2.26T | 31.4 | 0.95% |
| PLTR | Palantir Technologies Inc | 0.03% | $169.53 | -0.5% | $407.4B | 144.9 | - |
| NOW | ServiceNow Inc | 0.03% | $131.11 | -2.3% | $135.6B | 81.9 | - |
Investor Checklist for the Alpha Architect Growth ETF
Here are the key points to review before investing in GARY. Because it is an actively managed growth ETF, investors should evaluate it against a different set of criteria than passive ETFs — carefully examining the fee burden, the management team's stock-selection track record, and the volatility characteristic of growth stocks.
| Checkpoint | What to Verify | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Fee differential versus passive growth ETFs | Tends to be somewhat higher |
| 📈 Fund Performance | Track record of outperformance versus the benchmark | Requires verification |
| 📊 Growth-Stock Concentration | Trend in weighting toward technology and growth themes | Heavy growth-stock weighting |
| 💱 FX Exposure | Impact on returns measured in KRW | No currency hedging applied |
Given the fund's active management style, performance is heavily dependent on the management team's capabilities, and the growth-stock concentration can amplify volatility during rate-hike cycles or risk-off environments. The higher fee relative to passive products also weighs on long-term returns.
This fund is a suitable choice for investors who want the management team's active selection of growth stocks. For those prioritizing cost minimization and straightforward index exposure, low-expense passive growth ETFs such as VUG or SCHG may be a better fit.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 11, 2026.