ECML ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings and Alternative ETFs
The Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an actively managed ETF that uses a quantitative systematic model to select undervalued US value stocks. The key selection criteria are its expense burden relative to the category average and its non-index-tracking approach, and investors weigh its dividends and outlook when seeking value stock exposure.
What Is the Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF?
This is an actively managed value investing ETF that uses a quantitative model to select US-listed stocks judged to be undervalued relative to their fundamentals. It does not track a specific index. Instead, the portfolio is built from the management team's systematic analysis.
It is suited to long-term investors who want exposure to value-focused active management that goes beyond index tracking.
It is an actively managed ETF run by EA Series Trust.
How Do You Invest in the Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracked Index | None (active management) |
| Management Style | Active (quantitative model selection) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | As needed, based on the management model's judgment |
| Dividend Frequency | Irregular |
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% |
The manager holds undervalued stocks selected through a quantitative, systematic model that uses company fundamental indicators. Drawing on a broad candidate pool of stocks listed on major US exchanges, it picks value stocks with a long-term perspective and adjusts weightings and holdings based on the model's judgment.
- A quantitative, systematic value stock selection model
- An actively managed structure that does not track an index
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $124.5M, and the expense ratio is 0.95% per year.
Compared with similar ETFs that also follow a quantitative value model, it differs in fees and management philosophy, so a direct comparison is necessary.
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Performance and Trends
The value style has shown a pattern in which its relative performance versus growth stocks diverges depending on the market phase, and because of the nature of active models, performance can vary widely even within the same category. Short-term returns are affected by the interest rate and earnings environment.
The small- and mid-cap value category tends to hold less capital than large core ETFs, and fund flows tend to fluctuate with the value stock preference cycle and market interest in active strategies.
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Strengths and Weaknesses
Its strength is systematic quantitative value selection, while its weaknesses are the high fee burden of an active structure and its dependence on model performance.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Alternatives and Related Products
Comparable products in the same quantitative value category shown in the table include QVAL, DVAL and MVAL, which differ in manager, fees and selection method. If you want broader exposure to US value stocks, you can also consider alternatives such as VTV, a low-cost passive ETF, and IJS, which focuses on small-cap value stocks. The key consideration is the choice between the fee burden of an active strategy and passive alternatives.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | $64.54 | +0.5% | $696.6M | 0.28% | 1.36% | +40.2% | |
| BrandywineGLOBAL - Dynamic US Large Cap Value ETF | $15.72 | +0.0% | $59.8M | 0.49% | 5.15% | +8.0% | |
| Miller Value Partners Leverage ETF | $42.58 | -3.6% | $32.3M | 1.72% | 0.68% | +14.3% | |
| VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF | $39.51 | +0.2% | $3.0M | 0.50% | 1.6% | +12.4% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alcoa Corp | 0.03% | $39.19 | -1.8% | $10.3B | 6.8 | 1.02% | |
| Mueller Industries Inc | 0.05% | $54.56 | -2.2% | $11.9B | 14.0 | 1.19% | |
| Photronics Inc | 0.03% | $27.58 | -5.3% | $1.6B | 9.8 | - | |
| NEM | Newmont Corp | 0.03% | $106.61 | -4.6% | $110.8B | 12.4 | 0.97% |
| APA Corp | 0.02% | $52.82 | +2.5% | $18.5B | 11.2 | 1.91% | |
| CF Industries Holdings Inc | 0.02% | $123.30 | +4.4% | $18.7B | 9.2 | 1.76% | |
| Perdoceo Education Corp | 0.02% | $29.81 | -5.0% | $1.9B | 10.8 | 2.08% | |
| Matson Inc | 0.02% | $223.85 | -1.4% | $6.7B | 15.0 | 0.65% | |
| Owens Corning | 0.02% | $121.15 | -0.4% | $9.6B | - | 2.55% |
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in ECML. Because it is an active value ETF, it is important to thoroughly check three things in advance: the fee burden, the non-index-tracking management approach, and value style exposure.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the fee burden of the active structure | Higher than the category average |
| 🧮 Management Style | Understand the non-index-tracking quantitative model | Active management |
| 📊 Style Exposure | Review the impact of the value stock cycle | Value-focused |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Impact on returns converted to Korean won | No currency hedge applied |
The active model's selection results and the value style cycle are the main variables for performance. It may underperform in relative terms during periods of growth stock strength, and the fee burden can affect cumulative long-term returns.
It is an option worth considering for investors who want active exposure to quantitative value investing. If cost is your priority, you might consider a low-cost passive value ETF such as VTV, and if you prefer a systematic value selection model, you might consider this ETF.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 26, 2026.