USSTOCK.TODAY
Weekend. Closed
Log in Sign up
ETF Profiles

ECML ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings and Alternative ETFs

Updated June 26, 2026 · First published June 26, 2026

The Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an actively managed ETF that uses a quantitative systematic model to select undervalued US value stocks. The key selection criteria are its expense burden relative to the category average and its non-index-tracking approach, and investors weigh its dividends and outlook when seeking value stock exposure.

Briefs · earnings · signals, first Subscribe
🏷️

What Is the Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF?

This is an actively managed value investing ETF that uses a quantitative model to select US-listed stocks judged to be undervalued relative to their fundamentals. It does not track a specific index. Instead, the portfolio is built from the management team's systematic analysis.

It is suited to long-term investors who want exposure to value-focused active management that goes beyond index tracking.

It is an actively managed ETF run by EA Series Trust.

💰

How Do You Invest in the Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF?

ItemDetails
Tracked IndexNone (active management)
Management StyleActive (quantitative model selection)
Rebalancing FrequencyAs needed, based on the management model's judgment
Dividend FrequencyIrregular
Expense Ratio0.95%

The manager holds undervalued stocks selected through a quantitative, systematic model that uses company fundamental indicators. Drawing on a broad candidate pool of stocks listed on major US exchanges, it picks value stocks with a long-term perspective and adjusts weightings and holdings based on the model's judgment.

  • A quantitative, systematic value stock selection model
  • An actively managed structure that does not track an index
📐

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)

Assets under management (AUM) stand at $124.5M, and the expense ratio is 0.95% per year.

Compared with similar ETFs that also follow a quantitative value model, it differs in fees and management philosophy, so a direct comparison is necessary.

📈

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Performance and Trends

1-Year Price Performance
Dividend & Yield
Dividend Yield 1.14%
Annual Dividend (TTM) $0.46
1Y Return +24.0%
Next Ex-Dividend Date 12/23/2025
52-Week Price Range
$40
Low $32 High $42
vs. low +26.75% vs. high -5.01%

The value style has shown a pattern in which its relative performance versus growth stocks diverges depending on the market phase, and because of the nature of active models, performance can vary widely even within the same category. Short-term returns are affected by the interest rate and earnings environment.

The small- and mid-cap value category tends to hold less capital than large core ETFs, and fund flows tend to fluctuate with the value stock preference cycle and market interest in active strategies.

⚔️

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Strengths and Weaknesses

Its strength is systematic quantitative value selection, while its weaknesses are the high fee burden of an active structure and its dependence on model performance.

💪 Key Strengths

Quantitative Value Selection
The management team's systematic model picks undervalued candidates, giving you exposure to value investing.
Flexibility Without Index Tracking
Because it is not tied to a specific index, the portfolio is adjusted based on the model's judgment.
Long-Term Management Perspective
It aims to select value stocks with a long-term holding perspective rather than short-term trading.

⚠️ Points to Watch

Fee Burden
Its active management structure means fees tend to be higher than the category average.
Dependence on Model Performance
Performance hinges on the quantitative model's selection results, so it may lag the market.
Value Style Risk
During periods of growth stock strength, the value style may underperform in relative terms.
🔄

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Alternatives and Related Products

Comparable products in the same quantitative value category shown in the table include QVAL, DVAL and MVAL, which differ in manager, fees and selection method. If you want broader exposure to US value stocks, you can also consider alternatives such as VTV, a low-cost passive ETF, and IJS, which focuses on small-cap value stocks. The key consideration is the choice between the fee burden of an active strategy and passive alternatives.

Peer Comparison ETFs
TickerNamePriceChangeAUMTotal Expense RatioDividend Yield1Y
QVALQVALAlpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF$64.54+0.5%$696.6M0.28%1.36%+40.2%
DVALDVALBrandywineGLOBAL - Dynamic US Large Cap Value ETF$15.72+0.0%$59.8M0.49%5.15%+8.0%
MVPLMVPLMiller Value Partners Leverage ETF$42.58-3.6%$32.3M1.72%0.68%+14.3%
MVALMVALVanEck Morningstar Wide Moat Value ETF$39.51+0.2%$3.0M0.50%1.6%+12.4%
Top Holdings
TickerNameWeightPriceChangeMarket CapP/EDividend Yield
AAAAAlcoa Corp0.03%$39.19-1.8%$10.3B6.81.02%
MLIMLIMueller Industries Inc0.05%$54.56-2.2%$11.9B14.01.19%
PLABPLABPhotronics Inc0.03%$27.58-5.3%$1.6B9.8-
NEMNewmont Corp0.03%$106.61-4.6%$110.8B12.40.97%
APAAPAAPA Corp0.02%$52.82+2.5%$18.5B11.21.91%
CFCFCF Industries Holdings Inc0.02%$123.30+4.4%$18.7B9.21.76%
PRDOPRDOPerdoceo Education Corp0.02%$29.81-5.0%$1.9B10.82.08%
MATXMATXMatson Inc0.02%$223.85-1.4%$6.7B15.00.65%
OCOCOwens Corning0.02%$121.15-0.4%$9.6B-2.55%
✅

Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF Investor Checkpoints

Here are the points to review before investing in ECML. Because it is an active value ETF, it is important to thoroughly check three things in advance: the fee burden, the non-index-tracking management approach, and value style exposure.

CheckpointWhat to CheckCurrent Status
💵 Expense RatioCheck the fee burden of the active structureHigher than the category average
🧮 Management StyleUnderstand the non-index-tracking quantitative modelActive management
📊 Style ExposureReview the impact of the value stock cycleValue-focused
💱 Exchange RateImpact on returns converted to Korean wonNo currency hedge applied

The active model's selection results and the value style cycle are the main variables for performance. It may underperform in relative terms during periods of growth stock strength, and the fee burden can affect cumulative long-term returns.

It is an option worth considering for investors who want active exposure to quantitative value investing. If cost is your priority, you might consider a low-cost passive value ETF such as VTV, and if you prefer a systematic value selection model, you might consider this ETF.

Briefs · earnings · signals, first Subscribe

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.

This article reflects information as of June 26, 2026.

Today's 5 AI picks, all free
Nothing hidden: past picks and how they did against the S&P 500.
See today's picks →