CLSE ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Convergence Long Short Equity ETF is an actively managed long-short product that takes both long and short positions in US equities, targeting excess returns on both sides. Key checkpoints include the expense ratio, strategy complexity, and growth outlook, with comparisons against other long-short and alternative ETFs serving as selection criteria; the trading ticker is CLSE.
It is an actively managed long-short ETF that takes both long and short positions in US equities. The manager uses fundamental ranking analysis to buy stocks it views as promising and short-sell those it expects to underperform, maintaining a net long exposure.
It is suited for investors seeking excess returns on both the long and short sides while relying less on overall market direction than traditional equity strategies.
It is an ETF run by Convergence using an active management approach.
How to Invest in the Convergence Long Short Equity ETF| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracking Index | Active (non-benchmark tracking) |
| Management Style | Active (Long-Short) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Discretionary (manager judgment) |
| Dividend Frequency | Annual |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52% |
The manager uses fundamental ranking analysis to evaluate US equities, buying stocks it views as promising and short-selling those expected to underperform. Long weightings are kept greater than short weightings to maintain net long exposure, while pursuing excess returns on both the long and short sides across market cycles.
- Long-short structure combining long and short positions
- Management that maintains net long exposure
Convergence Long Short Equity ETF Size and Cost (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $914.3M, with a total expense ratio of 1.52% annually.
Unlike typical equity ETFs, this strategy uses short-selling to pursue gains even from declining names, but the strategy is complex, the fees are high, and short-selling loss risk is layered on top.
Convergence Long Short Equity ETF Performance and Flows
Long-short performance depends on the relative returns of the long and short positions rather than the overall market direction. When stock selection hits, differentiated performance versus the market can be expected; however, when longs underperform and shorts rally, losses can occur on both sides.
Long-short ETFs tend to draw attention during periods when concerns about market volatility grow or demand for diversifying alternative strategies rises, while capital may shift into plain equity ETFs during risk-asset bull markets.
Convergence Long Short Equity ETF Pros and Cons
The strength lies in pursuing excess returns on both the long and short sides, while the weaknesses are the strategy's complexity, short-selling risk, and high expense ratio.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Convergence Long Short Equity ETF Alternatives and Related Products
Tickers such as EHLS and FFLS shown in the table are similar ETFs running the same long-short strategy, while HDGE and others are bear-style ETFs focused on short-selling. For diversification across alternative strategies, investors can also compare low-volatility long-short BTAL, merger-arbitrage MNA, and managed-futures DBMF. These differ in strategy content, market exposure, and expense ratios, so selection should be tailored to risk tolerance.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Twin Oak Short Horizon Absolute Return ETF | $29.04 | -0.0% | $104.8M | 0.25% | - | +3.6% | |
| TrueShares Quarterly Bear Hedge ETF | $23.88 | +0.2% | $75.1M | 0.79% | 3.27% | -3.3% | |
| Even Herd Long Short ETF | $25.52 | -0.8% | $58.8M | 3.35% | - | +13.0% | |
| AdvisorShares Active Bear ETF | $14.69 | +1.2% | $56.5M | 3.62% | 3.85% | -9.0% | |
| The Future Fund Long/Short ETF | $22.92 | -0.0% | $44.0M | 1.60% | 0.14% | -5.0% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 0.04% | $218.36 | -2.4% | $5.26T | 27.6 | 0.34% |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 0.03% | $298.01 | -5.7% | $372.9B | 51.7 | 0.4% |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 0.04% | $979.91 | -4.7% | $1.11T | 22.2 | 0.06% |
| NVDA | NVIDIA Corp | 0.04% | $218.36 | -2.4% | $5.26T | 27.6 | 0.34% |
| MU | Micron Technology Inc | 0.04% | $979.91 | -4.7% | $1.11T | 22.2 | 0.06% |
| LRCX | Lam Research Corp | 0.03% | $298.01 | -5.7% | $372.9B | 51.7 | 0.4% |
| AMD | Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.03% | $503.48 | -3.4% | $821.9B | 129.2 | - |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 0.03% | $360.65 | -1.0% | $1.72T | 46.0 | 0.72% |
| AVGO | Broadcom Inc | 0.03% | $360.65 | -1.0% | $1.72T | 46.0 | 0.72% |
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 0.03% | $251.89 | -0.2% | $2.72T | 20.3 | - |
Investor Checklist for the Convergence Long Short Equity ETF
Here are the checkpoints to review before investing in CLSE. As a long-short ETF, it is important to verify strategy complexity, short-selling risk, fee level, and management style in advance.
| Checkpoint | What to Confirm | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the cumulative impact of long-short management fees | On the high side |
| 🔀 Strategy Complexity | Confirm the long-short strategy details | Needs review |
| 📉 Short-Selling Risk | Risk of losses when shorted stocks rise | Needs review |
| 🔍 Management Style | Confirm the fundamental ranking analysis | Active |
Losses occur if short-sold stocks rise, and losses can come from both sides when longs underperform and shorts rally. Strategy complexity and the higher fees associated with long-short management are also risk factors.
It is a long-short ETF suited for investors seeking excess returns on both sides while relying less on overall market direction. Investors wanting simple equity exposure may prefer a plain equity ETF, while those seeking a long-short strategy can consider CLSE as an option.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 4, 2026.