CLCV ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings and Alternative ETFs
The Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) actively selects large US value stocks and builds value-based criteria into its management. Investors should weigh its once-a-year distribution structure, its expense ratio, the outlook for value stocks, and how it differs from other large-cap value ETFs.
What Is the Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF?
The CLCV ETF is an actively managed fund that gives investors exposure to large US value stocks, using Crossmark's value-based selection process to pursue long-term capital growth. Rather than tracking a specific index as is, it adjusts its holdings based on management judgment.
It suits long-term investors who agree with its emphasis on value characteristics among large US stocks and with the manager's selection approach, and who want to add a different approach from broad index-based products to their portfolios.
It is an actively managed ETF run by Crossmark.
How Does the Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Tracking Index | Actively managed value stock strategy |
| Management Style | Active selection |
| Rebalancing Frequency | Adjusted at management's discretion |
| Distribution Frequency | Once a year |
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% |
| Manager | Crossmark |
This fund actively selects companies that show value characteristics among large US stocks, while also applying Crossmark's value-based criteria. Unlike index-replicating products, management judgment and data analysis influence the holdings, so it is worth examining how the selection philosophy affects portfolio results.
- Value-based selection: Management reflects not only value characteristics but also Crossmark's own value-based criteria in its decisions.
- Active management structure: Because the fund does not replicate a fixed index, its holdings can change depending on management judgment.
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Expense Ratio)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $18.7M, and the expense ratio is 0.50% per year.
As a micro-cap-sized fund, the CLCV ETF may differ from larger peer products in its trading environment. Before trading, check the bid-ask spread and trading volume, and long-term holders should also compare differences in fees and management approach.
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF Performance and Trends
Value stock performance can follow a different path from growth stocks depending on interest rates, economic expectations, and the stability of corporate earnings. Because the CLCV ETF combines active management with value-based selection, investors should check not only the overall market direction but also how selection results affect performance swings.
For large-cap value products, fund flows can shift depending on how the market interprets the economic cycle and the interest rate environment. Because the CLCV ETF is a micro-cap-sized product, consider how changes in fund inflows and outflows and in the trading environment may affect perceived liquidity, and review buy and sell conditions as well.
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF Pros and Cons
Active value stock selection and value-based criteria are its strengths, while its non-diversified structure and the trading and holdings volatility that come with its micro-cap size are factors to watch.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Note
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF Alternative and Related ETFs
In the comparison table, the VTV ETF is a broad value stock option backed by low fees and a very large asset base. The IWD ETF offers exposure to Russell-family value stocks, and the IVE ETF provides access to large-cap value stocks. The VBR ETF widens the scope to small-cap value stocks, and the SPYV ETF can be compared by those who want large-cap value exposure. Unlike these, the CLCV ETF combines active management with value-based selection, so it is best to focus on that point while examining differences in fees, size, and trading environment.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | $230.04 | +1.0% | $196.2B | 0.03% | 1.81% | +22.0% | |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value Index Fund | $263.81 | +0.5% | $84.7B | 0.18% | 1.34% | +27.3% | |
| iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | $242.73 | +0.9% | $51.4B | 0.18% | 1.49% | +14.9% | |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | $65.01 | +0.9% | $38.7B | 0.04% | 1.63% | +14.8% | |
| Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | $248.65 | +0.3% | $37.8B | 0.05% | 1.78% | +19.4% |
Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF Investor Checkpoints
When considering the CLCV ETF, start by looking at what difference value-based selection makes compared with typical index-based value products. The advantage of active management lies in the potential for skilled selection, but results can vary with management judgment and market conditions, so costs and trading conditions should be checked as well.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Management Style | The roles of value-based selection and active management | Review management philosophy |
| Distribution Structure | Check whether a once-a-year distribution fits your cash flow plan | Check distribution frequency |
| Trading Environment | Review bid-ask spread, trading volume, and order methods | Check needed |
| Comparison Basis | Compare fees and management structure with peer products | Comparison needed |
A non-diversified structure and active management mean that the influence of specific issuers and management judgment can be more strongly reflected in performance. In addition, value-based selection can limit some investment opportunities, and the trading environment of a micro-cap-sized product can vary with market conditions. Geopolitical variables and interest rate changes can also affect the course of value stocks.
The CLCV ETF is worth considering for investors who want to add active management and value-based selection to their large-cap value exposure. If you prefer simple index tracking, compare fees and trading environment against the similar ETFs in the comparison table, and decide after confirming that the once-a-year distribution structure fits your investment goals.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of August 18, 2026.