CGVV ETF: What Is It? A Complete Guide to Returns, Expense Ratio, Holdings, and Alternative ETFs
The Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF (ticker CGVV) is built around a multi-manager structure and fundamental stock selection. Differences from passive value ETFs such as VTV and IWD in management style, fees, and dividends are the key factors in choosing between them.
What Is the Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF?
This is an actively managed ETF that selects US large-cap value stocks through fundamental analysis. Within the large-cap market capitalization range of the Russell 1000 Index, it focuses on undervalued, high-quality companies, and the management team's stock selection drives performance.
It suits long-term investors who prefer value stock exposure through active stock selection over passive index tracking.
It is an ETF run by Capital Group using an active management approach.
How Does the Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF Invest?
| Item | Details |
|---|---|
| Benchmark Index | Russell 1000 (value style, active) |
| Management Style | Active (stock selection) |
| Rebalancing Frequency | At the managers' discretion |
| Dividend Frequency | Quarterly |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.33% |
Under normal market conditions, the fund invests most of its net assets in stocks of US large-cap value companies. It selects undervalued, high-quality companies based on fundamental analysis, and through Capital Group's distinctive multi-manager system, several portfolio managers each run a portion of the portfolio.
- Multi-manager active management structure
- Value stock selection based on fundamental analysis
Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF Size and Costs (AUM and Management Fee)
Assets under management (AUM) stand at $162.0M, and the total expense ratio is 0.33% per year.
Its fees are somewhat higher than those of passive value ETFs such as VTV and IWD, but it seeks differentiated performance through active stock selection.
Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF Performance and Trends
The value style alternates cyclically with growth stocks between strength and weakness, and because the fund is actively managed, its performance can diverge from the market average. Short-term swings are influenced by the interest rate environment and earnings seasons.
Fund flows form in response to demand for the value style and interest in active ETFs. As a relatively recent launch, its asset size is small to mid-sized within its category, and the pace of inflows may vary depending on management results.
Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF Pros and Cons
Its strengths are active stock selection and Capital Group's management capabilities, while its weaknesses are higher fees than passive funds and heavy dependence on management results.
💪 Key Strengths
⚠️ Points to Watch
Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF Alternative ETFs and Related Products
VTV, IVE, and IWD shown in the table are lower-fee passive ETFs that track the same US large-cap value category, while VBR extends exposure to small-cap value stocks. You can also consider CGDV, another Capital Group active ETF that focuses on dividend value stocks, which is a useful reference for comparing active and passive management.
| Ticker | Name | Price | Change | AUM | Total Expense Ratio | Dividend Yield | 1Y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF | $228.02 | -0.4% | $196.6B | 0.03% | 1.83% | +22.9% | |
| iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF | $258.65 | -0.8% | $83.9B | 0.18% | 1.37% | +26.9% | |
| iShares S&P 500 Value ETF | $239.53 | -0.8% | $51.1B | 0.18% | 1.51% | +15.0% | |
| State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF | $64.13 | -0.8% | $39.2B | 0.04% | 1.65% | +14.9% | |
| Vanguard Morningstar Small-Cap Value ETF | $243.44 | -0.6% | $37.3B | 0.05% | 1.82% | +18.4% |
| Ticker | Name | Weight | Price | Change | Market Cap | P/E | Dividend Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMZN | Amazon.com Inc | 0.16% | $240.35 | -1.4% | $2.59T | 19.4 | - |
| MSFT | Microsoft Corp | 0.06% | $521.91 | -1.6% | $3.88T | 27.3 | 0.74% |
| AMAT | Applied Materials Inc | 0.04% | $390.09 | -7.5% | $309.6B | 33.6 | 0.5% |
| GOOG | Alphabet Inc | 0.04% | $278.22 | -1.4% | $3.41T | 14.5 | 0.31% |
| INTC | Intel Corp | 0.04% | $65.76 | -28.6% | $347.6B | - | 0.06% |
| META | Meta Platforms Inc | 0.04% | $614.99 | -1.5% | $1.57T | 21.0 | 0.3% |
| UBER | Uber Technologies Inc | 0.03% | $65.25 | -0.8% | $133.3B | 14.3 | - |
| GEHC | GE HealthCare Technologies Inc | 0.03% | $76.57 | +0.2% | $34.6B | 16.2 | 0.14% |
Capital Group US Large-Cap Value ETF Investor Checkpoints
Here are the points to review before investing in CGVV. As an active value ETF, its fee burden, management results, and value style exposure should be checked in advance, and it is wise to compare it with passive value ETFs to see whether it fits your investment profile.
| Checkpoint | What to Check | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| 💵 Expense Ratio | Check the fee burden compared with passive value ETFs | Somewhat high |
| 📊 Management Results | Track the active strategy's performance versus the index | Needs verification |
| 📈 Style Exposure | Check the concentration in large-cap value stocks | Value style |
| 💱 Exchange Rate | Impact on returns converted to Korean won | No currency hedge |
Because it is actively managed, performance relative to the index can vary depending on the managers' stock selection results. In periods when the value style is weak, relative underperformance may occur, so costs and performance should be reviewed together.
It suits investors who want large-cap value exposure through active stock selection rather than passive index tracking. If minimizing costs is the priority, passive value ETFs such as VTV and IWD fit better, while CGVV is the candidate for those who want to draw on active management expertise.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. All investment responsibility lies with the investor.
This article reflects information as of June 25, 2026.